#cofacts
2018-08-01
今晚能開一下 hangout 讓我線上討論嗎
@changhc84
可以 8點多？
Ok
Ok 了再敲我喲
所以主要是跟桓誠聊嗎
因為我們其他人應該都會在進行這個：
因為我們其他人應該都會在進行這個：
matters.news
今天晚上十點的線上問答，主角是一群致力於揪出網路謠言跟不實訊息的人，他們是「真的假的」。 「真的假的」，第一次聽到這個名字的人，可能會愣一下，這裡說的「真的假的」不是英文的 ” really? ” ，
帥喔 ++
hackmd.io 
@ttcat 我們好囉
Link?
2018-08-02
Hi @han.kirstenly
I would like to ask if we can make the Google Doc interview note public?
If yes, under what license would you publicize the note? I would suggest CC0 or CC BY-4.0
I would like to ask if we can make the Google Doc interview note public?
If yes, under what license would you publicize the note? I would suggest CC0 or CC BY-4.0
2018-08-03
Hi all,
因為 Puppeteer 要在 docker 裡跑起來要裝一堆東西進 image，我覺得應該要把 url rendering 分拆出去變成獨立 microservice, 理由是：
1. 他的 dependency 太多 (see: https://github.com/cofacts/url-resolver/blob/master/Dockerfile ) 通通放一起會讓 api server 的 image 肥大，不利於未來 deploy
2. 我沒辦法讓 Docker 裡的 Puppeteer 在不加 --no-sandbox 的狀況下執行，讓我覺得想要把整個 URL rendering 拆出去，這樣就算 load 到惡意網頁被打爆，也只會在死 url rendering 的部分 (話說回來，現在一堆 try puppeteer 的東西都用 --no-sandbox 真的沒問題嗎 )
因為 Puppeteer 要在 docker 裡跑起來要裝一堆東西進 image，我覺得應該要把 url rendering 分拆出去變成獨立 microservice, 理由是：
1. 他的 dependency 太多 (see: https://github.com/cofacts/url-resolver/blob/master/Dockerfile ) 通通放一起會讓 api server 的 image 肥大，不利於未來 deploy
2. 我沒辦法讓 Docker 裡的 Puppeteer 在不加 --no-sandbox 的狀況下執行，讓我覺得想要把整個 URL rendering 拆出去，這樣就算 load 到惡意網頁被打爆，也只會在死 url rendering 的部分 (話說回來，現在一堆 try puppeteer 的東西都用 --no-sandbox 真的沒問題嗎 )
我打算拆出去的部份是: given url, return `{title, summary, rawHtml}` 這樣的功能，也就是把 puppeteer 與 readability.js 拆過去。服務不接資料庫，輸入 url 就一定會去 scrap 資料回來。
具體來說，會跑進 microservice 的是這些 code: https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-api/blob/master/src/util/scrapUrls.js#L9-L113
以下東西會保留在 Rumors-api:
1. 從文字裡拆出 URL
2. 看看 Elasticsearch 裡這個 URL 是不是已經被爬過了， I.e. 處理 caching
3. 從 Microservice 拿到 `{title, summary, rawHtml}` 之後，用適當方式放進 elasticsearch
具體來說，會跑進 microservice 的是這些 code: https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-api/blob/master/src/util/scrapUrls.js#L9-L113
以下東西會保留在 Rumors-api:
1. 從文字裡拆出 URL
2. 看看 Elasticsearch 裡這個 URL 是不是已經被爬過了， I.e. 處理 caching
3. 從 Microservice 拿到 `{title, summary, rawHtml}` 之後，用適當方式放進 elasticsearch
然後 rumors-api 與 URL scrapping microservice 之間隨便用個 shared secret 保障沒有別人會亂用這個 scrapping microservice
最後，我昨天晚上有試過，這樣的 setup 可以讓 puppeteer 在 docker 裡跑起來：https://github.com/cofacts/url-resolver/blob/master/Dockerfile
我試著把 puppeteer deploy 到 now 上，他跟我抱怨 image 太大。我今晚會拆出 Base image 再試試看，總之上述分拆在技術上確定可行（拆出去是會動的），但需要聽聽大家的意見。
@ggm @darkbtf @sunrise91.t3 @桓誠我不知道你的ID哭哭
我試著把 puppeteer deploy 到 now 上，他跟我抱怨 image 太大。我今晚會拆出 Base image 再試試看，總之上述分拆在技術上確定可行（拆出去是會動的），但需要聽聽大家的意見。
@ggm @darkbtf @sunrise91.t3 @桓誠我不知道你的ID哭哭
@changhc84 桓誠應該是這個 XD
可以呀我覺得這樣切不錯 是說你機器開在哪裡呀 某台 AWS 上 發現好像沒有給過你機器的錢？
所以機器上面會跑三個服務: ElasticSearch, url-resolver, API 這樣嗎
rumors-api 是在 linode 上，每月 USD 10，目前我自己付
對耶其實我可以跟你請款齁 XD
對耶其實我可以跟你請款齁 XD
那台 linode 很熱鬧，同時跑
elasticsearch, api, site (next.js 是 SSR，所以也是獨立的 server)
*而且* Staging stack 是分開的
所以其實跑了 6 個服務：production es, production api, production site, staging es, staging api, staging site
然後用 docker-compose 管理：https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-deploy/blob/master/docker-compose.yml
那 url-resolver 我想丟去 now ( https://zeit.co/now )
所以會是分開的
不希望會佔到這個小 linode 的資源
不過我好奇的是
now 每次 deploy 的 URL 都不一樣嗎？這樣他們那裏不會有一堆不同版本的 code 要 always online?
now 每次 deploy 的 URL 都不一樣嗎？這樣他們那裏不會有一堆不同版本的 code 要 always online?
ZEIT Documentation
Using Now `alias` to assign a domain to your deployments
結果我連不上 now
twitter.com
The latest Tweets from ZEIT Status (@zeit_status). Quick updates on the status of our infrastructure and microservices
2018-08-05
然後看來應該是上不了 now
因為他限制 docker image size 100MB
而且好像是新的限制：https://dev.to/hitochan777/nowsh-docker-image-size-limitation-59j6
所以我 survey 到的那些號稱可以 1-click deploy to now 的，可能只是「以前可以」
因為他限制 docker image size 100MB
而且好像是新的限制：https://dev.to/hitochan777/nowsh-docker-image-size-limitation-59j6
所以我 survey 到的那些號稱可以 1-click deploy to now 的，可能只是「以前可以」
The Practical Dev
Does anyone know if now.sh limits the size of docker images? I failed to deploy...
- 😢1
GitHub
micro-website-api - An API microservice that crawls dynamic website powered by puppeteer.
嗯 base image 就過大了 QQ https://hub.docker.com/r/evenchange4/docker-puppeteer/tags/
實測也確實會被 now 擋住
GGG
2018-08-06
總之接下來我的做法會是
還是拆兩個 image，但是通通都塞 linode 的同一台。
因為找不到合適的地方 deploy。
GCP 的 app engine 號稱可以無痛用 puppeteer ( https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/standard/nodejs/using-headless-chrome-with-puppeteer ) 但實際上照著做，卻一直遇到 500 internal server error，然後 log 顯示 dependency 有缺，我黑人問號。
還是拆兩個 image，但是通通都塞 linode 的同一台。
因為找不到合適的地方 deploy。
GCP 的 app engine 號稱可以無痛用 puppeteer ( https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/standard/nodejs/using-headless-chrome-with-puppeteer ) 但實際上照著做，卻一直遇到 500 internal server error，然後 log 顯示 dependency 有缺，我黑人問號。
OCF 已同意可協助 Cofacts 粉絲團進行企業認證
2- 🐳2
2018-08-08
@han.kirstenly I’d like to ask if we can share the interview note publicly under a Creative Commons license? Maybe CC0? In this way this note can help future interviewers / journalists as well.
I’m fine with this!
great, thanks for sharing the interview note!
I’m fine with this!
- 👍1
great, thanks for sharing the interview note!
我其實在想我們統一放到某個平台好不？好管理也好記帳，稍微多噴一點錢也還好 GCP 的話我還有 Credit 可以用到明年中
URL resolver 分家之後我們就跑了三個平台了
是說各個 service 嗎
恩恩
可以唷
那看要不要拆 VM?
那看要不要拆 VM?
現在想想很分散
其實現在沒很分散唷
url resolver 因為在 now 跑不起來
我說分三個平台？
噢噢
所以打算塞回 api 那裏
原來如此
這樣就依然是 linode 與 heroku
heroku for line bot
linode for everything else
恩恩
那好像也還好 不然我原本在想可以全上 docker hub 然後跑在 k8s 上面之類的
是說我的 g0v summit talk 是不是沒上啊 QAQ
@chihao
@chihao
剛剛寄信說明了，抱歉久等 QQ
我也沒上 XD
2018-08-09
如果 cofact 有開始考慮 whatsapp & FB chatbot , 是否有考慮跟一些國內的網路輿情公司討論 (甚至合作) eg: Qsearch & 星輿, 我個人會很有興趣參與牽線並討論
- 👍1
噢噢噢好像不錯耶，我是跟 Qsearch 蠻熟的，認識周世恩和空哥 不過星輿我就不認識了 XD 這部分是還沒有規劃到那邊，下次可以討論看看
好喔, 之後有機會再看看能不能抓出謠言的規則 (eg: 反查出來是內容農場)
我覺得我們在這裡應該會是資料提供者的角色唷
而且
- 👍1
我們已經有開放資料了
但依照我們現在團隊的 capacity 而言
任何進一步的合作，感覺不一定會有辦法接得下呢
所以我們比較希望的是
大家可以自己取用這些資料
好, 瞭解,
我們專心在產品開發
畢竟 Cofacts 還有非常多該改進的
主要是 假新聞/公民科技 這塊 ocf 可能會開始去申請經費, 有機會的話, 我在想大家要如何串在一起
@ggm 有興趣嗎～～
2018-08-10
不行沒時間和精力 XD 我也覺得 cofacts 還有很多地方要做
我會再留意有沒有適合的人推坑 再介紹給 @pofeng XD
好喔, 沒問題, 謝謝, 兩位辛苦了
這還是非常非常早期, 亂說的階段, Qsearch 方面大概也只能提供資料
- 👍1
恩恩不過應該是蠻有趣的 XD
是說有沒有人知道要怎麼加進去 https://github.com/g0v 呀
GitHub is where people build software. More than 28 million people use GitHub to discover, fork, and contribute to over 85 million projects.
找 clkao
- 👍1
- 1
噢噢謝謝！
@johnny has joined the channel
- 🙌1
剛剛寄信說明了，抱歉久等 QQ
1
想請問 Cofacts 的大家，接下來幾週是不是就是週三晚上的固定會議？還有沒有別的聚會能讓我去稍微跟拍？我在準備 g0v 九月初在奧地利的展覽 QAQ
QAQ
2018-08-11
8/24 小聚如何
- 🙌1
@lucien 請做宣傳圖喔
我們又只剩下兩個禮拜可以宣傳了
我們又只剩下兩個禮拜可以宣傳了
2018-08-15
8/18 投票指南記者會，歡迎有空的朋友來參與
- 1
- 👍2
4
@johnny 直接入場就可以了嗎？
恩恩對，被擋的話樓下會有工作人員，就說參加投票指南記者會應該就沒問題了
不知道為什麼燃點一直很希望 Cofacts 來參加 ….
雖然很早，就一起來熱鬧一下？
@ggm 你會去投票指南嗎
你會去的話那我去沃草的
(週六活動大對撞)
你會去的話那我去沃草的
(週六活動大對撞)
90% 會 XDD 因為剛好很近
okok 那我去沃草的
投票指南交給你～～
投票指南交給你～～
@johnny 直接入場就可以了嗎？
恩恩對，被擋的話樓下會有工作人員，就說參加投票指南記者會應該就沒問題了
2018-08-15 13:15:12.458 114 <190>1 2018-08-15T13:15:12.031346+00:00 app web.1 - - { tag: 'unknown', 2018-08-15 13:15:12.458 116 <190>1 2018-08-15T13:15:12.031348+00:00 app web.1 - - platform: 'line', 2018-08-15 13:15:12.458 121 <190>1 2018-08-15T13:15:12.031350+00:00 app web.1 - - direction: 'outgoing', 2018-08-15 13:15:12.458 104 <190>1 2018-08-15T13:15:12.031351+00:00 app web.1 - - raw: 2018-08-15 13:15:12.458 149 <190>1 2018-08-15T13:15:12.031353+00:00 app web.1 - - { replyToken: '9c0af967c9054f789f2bcc266fbd7faf', 2018-08-15 13:15:12.458 120 <190>1 2018-08-15T13:15:12.031355+00:00 app web.1 - - messages: [Array], 2018-08-15 13:15:12.458 302 <190>1 2018-08-15T13:15:12.031356+00:00 app web.1 - - channelAccessToken: 'THtK0uItVbdqtMtoXhvYIM6FdXEkSOLdiNSSlxyT/wrSUUHNh07axrDT1W0y8DoAJVyaP2MVy7OyQhSXBxSPfZ7FGnWRHnUqn4SCt4G4GWKviPMDBCWhSG/r76arCLs8NTuYUYaBhYzICDP9AeQTggdB04t89/1O/w1cDnyilFU=' } } } 2018-08-15 13:15:12.458 94 <190>1 2018-08-15T13:15:12.031358+00:00 app web.1 - - 2018-08-15 13:15:21.792 310 <158>1 2018-08-15T13:15:21.603082+00:00 heroku router - - at=info method=POST path="/callback" host=<http://rumors-line-bot.herokuapp.com|rumors-line-bot.herokuapp.com> request_id=4cc64904-c945-4bcc-b57c-016a62fc8000 fwd="203.104.146.153" dyno=web.1 connect=0ms service=2ms status=200 bytes=137 protocol=https 2018-08-15 13:18:23.690 443 <134>1 2018-08-15T13:17:55+00:00 app heroku-redis - - source=REDIS addon=redis-concave-55484 sample#active-connections=2 sample#load-avg-1m=0.115 sample#load-avg-5m=0.09 sample#load-avg-15m=0.1 sample#read-iops=0 sample#write-iops=0 sample#memory-total=15664360kB sample#memory-free=11693660kB sample#memory-cached=972812kB sample#memory-redis=20068384bytes sample#hit-rate=0.95854 sample#evicted-keys=0
感謝小鹿
有臉書了
2018-08-16
8/25 g0v Summit 實體會議也在 Tmot Space
好像會很熱鬧
好像會很熱鬧
同樣時間地點
不知道為什麼燃點一直很希望 Cofacts 來參加 ….
雖然很早，就一起來熱鬧一下？
真的耶對撞惹
@yutin 塞得下嗎
只好大家都來當編輯
只好大家都來當編輯
@yutin has joined the channel
あれ？😆
Splice
At Cofacts in Taiwan, volunteer editors and a time-saving chatbot race to combat falsehoods on LINE.Over the past three months, Cofacts received more than 46,000 messages — and the chatbot was able to automatically answer 35,180 of them.
- 7
- 🐳3
- 👍1
Spotted a small inaccuracy:
Actually I have access to MyGoPen’s admin *after* Cofacts’ chatbot approach is implemented. But the chance to access indeed makes me realize that chatbot is an adequate approach.
But I think the inaccuracy does not affect the greatness of the article. Thank you for the detailed report @han.kirstenly!
Actually I have access to MyGoPen’s admin *after* Cofacts’ chatbot approach is implemented. But the chance to access indeed makes me realize that chatbot is an adequate approach.
But I think the inaccuracy does not affect the greatness of the article. Thank you for the detailed report @han.kirstenly!
Sorry about the inaccuracy! I’ll email the editors and let them know.
@ggm 你會去投票指南嗎
你會去的話那我去沃草的
(週六活動大對撞)
你會去的話那我去沃草的
(週六活動大對撞)
90% 會 XDD 因為剛好很近
okok 那我去沃草的
投票指南交給你～～
投票指南交給你～～
2018-08-21
Spotted a small inaccuracy:
Actually I have access to MyGoPen’s admin *after* Cofacts’ chatbot approach is implemented. But the chance to access indeed makes me realize that chatbot is an adequate approach.
But I think the inaccuracy does not affect the greatness of the article. Thank you for the detailed report @han.kirstenly!
Actually I have access to MyGoPen’s admin *after* Cofacts’ chatbot approach is implemented. But the chance to access indeed makes me realize that chatbot is an adequate approach.
But I think the inaccuracy does not affect the greatness of the article. Thank you for the detailed report @han.kirstenly!
2018-08-22
Sorry about the inaccuracy! I’ll email the editors and let them know.
- 1
請問今天 cofacts 是不是有開會？開放側拍嗎？
拍 都拍
8pm ~ 11pm 在 Workis
https://workis.space/
https://workis.space/
Workis 工作是
Workis是座落大安區巷內專注於「工作」的工作空間。是共同空間、咖啡廳、會議室、秘密基地、精神時光屋，有隱密的獨立包廂也有友善交流的開放空間，有策展空間也有不一定最專業但最用心煮的咖啡。在這裡我們希望你可以卸下平時的包袱，可以遇到一些可愛的人，可以重新找回自己。 Workis - 最硬也最溫暖的工作空間。
g0v 臨時展覽工作組感謝各位 🙇
@uvavaca has joined the channel
hello
Hi @uvavaca
When the message is in mandarin in this channel, it’s mostly about technical / programming stuff, which can be safely ignored 👩🏭
Hi everyone, @uvavaca is from El Poder de Elegir project.
https://ijnet.org/en/blog/ahead-colombia%E2%80%99s-elections-women-driven-initiative-fact-checks-information-whatsapp
Her project and Cofacts shares the same methodology - performs fact-checking collaboratively.
From our previous conversations I learned that El Poder de Elegir focuses more on infographics, gifs, videos and even audios for the elderies.
https://ijnet.org/en/blog/ahead-colombia%E2%80%99s-elections-women-driven-initiative-fact-checks-information-whatsapp
Her project and Cofacts shares the same methodology - performs fact-checking collaboratively.
From our previous conversations I learned that El Poder de Elegir focuses more on infographics, gifs, videos and even audios for the elderies.
ijnet.org
Chicas Poderosas' project, El Poder de Elegir, tackles misinformation on WhatsApp, one of the most-secretive social platforms, to help ensure that Colombian voters are making their decisions based on facts.
jajajaja hey im planing live in shenzhen so ....i need to star at list whit google traslate
Hmm I think you cannot access google translate from shenzhen lol
you may need baidu translate (?)
crying in spanish
lol, so this like slack but what is the difference whit the normal slack?
It’s ordinary Slack
it’s just started by g0v, the open-source civil tech community in Taiwan
and Cofacts is one of the g0v projects
o wow
From the news report ( https://ijnet.org/en/blog/ahead-colombia%E2%80%99s-elections-women-driven-initiative-fact-checks-information-whatsapp ) I see that you have fact-checking organization as the mentor and learns methodologies from them.
I think in Cofacts we do it in a less professional way. We just allow anyone to participate as an editor and allow them to reply to messages in their way
I think in Cofacts we do it in a less professional way. We just allow anyone to participate as an editor and allow them to reply to messages in their way
Here is the editor’s interface:
https://cofacts.g0v.tw/articles
Well it looks as if the CSS is not loaded --- well it currently just looks like that.
Feel free to consult our designer @lucien for the design (?)
https://cofacts.g0v.tw/articles
Well it looks as if the CSS is not loaded --- well it currently just looks like that.
Feel free to consult our designer @lucien for the design (?)
Hello i can help whit this if you want, is my think 🙂
@lucien I can give you a hand whit the UI
Similar to what you do in Whatsapp, we have a chatbot in LINE messaging app.
When the user sends a message, the chatbot would look it up in the database.
If there is no such entry, the user can send the message to the database
and it will show up here -->
https://cofacts.g0v.tw/articles?before=&after=&replyRequestCount=1&filter=all
When the user sends a message, the chatbot would look it up in the database.
If there is no such entry, the user can send the message to the database
and it will show up here -->
https://cofacts.g0v.tw/articles?before=&after=&replyRequestCount=1&filter=all
And anyone that logs in to the website — which is anyone with a facebook, twitter or github account — can be a editor. There is no background checks. Currently they can just start replying messages right away.
That’s why although we use the term “collaborative fact-checking”, I would admit that our methodology would lead to “providing crowd-sourced, different opinions”, as we cannot control the quality of replies on our platform to the last detail
But that’s the current working model
We have teams of journalists checking but we are not many in Mexico 3, Venezuela 5, Brazil 4 and Colombia 4
- 💪1
It is amazing to see that the same idea of “collaborative fact-checking” being carried out by people from different backgrounds.
Cofacts is more from a engineering background, thus the product focuses more on shortening the repeating process “find a suspicious message -> respond with different opinions” and hope that automatic response can be fast enough to stop rumors from spreading.
El Poder de Elegir, on the other hand, I think it puts more emphasis on the quality of the response and leveraging design expertise to maximize the spreading of each fact-checking reports
Cofacts is more from a engineering background, thus the product focuses more on shortening the repeating process “find a suspicious message -> respond with different opinions” and hope that automatic response can be fast enough to stop rumors from spreading.
El Poder de Elegir, on the other hand, I think it puts more emphasis on the quality of the response and leveraging design expertise to maximize the spreading of each fact-checking reports
is a excelent complement i think
we are looking for a go to the next step not than analogic process.
I am wondering that if a person wants to help El Poder de Elegir replying instant messages, what do they need to do?
Do they have to be one of the journalists in the newsrooms you are collaborating with?
Do they have to be one of the journalists in the newsrooms you are collaborating with?
I see that the news report mentions Meedan Check. Is there someone in El Poder de Elegir that creates new fact-check tasks on Check, and keeps track of each tasks to see if they are assigned to someone or has been finished and ready to publish?
I will tell you a little about the process of being able to choose so that they have a more or less idea of what we do and why it is a little different from the traditional newssrooms
1
We make an open call for journalists and designers from different parts of Colombia or from the provinces, to decentralize the information, generally they are people who do not know anything about fact checking, we do mentorships for a month on how to check and establish a base team. We have a public number to which people send the info they want to check and also the journalists go up, we have a step by step of 3 questions to know what is verifiable and what is not, if the chain complies with the steps, we make a writing council on Monday and we decided what is verifiable and what is not in check and we answer the questions of check, each journalist is assigned a check and that check has very well developed the assignments that arrive to your email.
When the journalists finish the checks they are reviewed by an editor and when this is approved a script is made for twitter thread, gif or audio depending on what is most convenient, go to the design team and generate the pieces, this is what we do a broadcast list in whathsapp and we massively send the verification, but of course it is manual and it is not focused 😞.
Wow it is a very professional streamline
I am wondering that if you work fulltime on this?
Chicas Poderosas
El Poder de Elegir: the collaborative fact-checking project, from Colombia to Latin America El Poder de Elegir is a project to monitor and fact-check the political information that circulates through WhatsApp during the campaign period of the presidential elections of 2018. It is proposed to monitor and verify in real time the information that circulates …
I am asking because all Cofacts team members have other day jobs
so am I
in this momento only Lia valero, Daian alexa and UVA (me)
(so actually I am talking to you while I am doing a day job as web developer. Shhh don’t tell my boss!)
- 😁1
but the rest of the teams are part time and all is volnteer
The latest Tweets from El Poder De Elegir (@ElPoder_Elegir). Somos el proyecto que verifica información difundida por WhatsApp en época electoral. Estamos en Colombia, Brasil, México Venezuela. <https://t.co/vTE0eZ4bjQ>
I have worked since December full time, but I also have other jobs, I need to eat, like Lia, the teams of the other countries all have other jobs, but usually there are many chains but the political discourse has to be the same, then many times with a single verification many chains are solved.
- 😮1
Is posible if the developer of check that also is part of el poder de elegir , be part of this team, he is really interesting in be here..
@pellaeon has joined the channel
@uvavaca Hola! Que tal!
Hola!!!
@uvavaca you mean inviting the developer of Check to this channel? Sure!
- 🦄1
@jamesmlee has joined the channel
@uvavaca We are very curious about how the workload is split over full-time (paid) members and part-time (not-paid) volunteers. Because we do want to have paid editors to facilitate the editor community, but we are afraid that this will cause the volunteers not wanting to contribute. How do you keep the system fair to all contributors while having some of paid workers?
Bueno la verdad es que nosotros tenemos el componente de capacitación
What we did was that initially we were all volunteers and I only paid the editor.
2. It worked that the girls saw that we the heads of the project did not receive money for it and we worked twice as much.
3. Also the free trainings, being in the team allowed access to the knowledge of meedan and allies, then we had webinars online.
2. It worked that the girls saw that we the heads of the project did not receive money for it and we worked twice as much.
3. Also the free trainings, being in the team allowed access to the knowledge of meedan and allies, then we had webinars online.
Thanks! It’s interesting to find that leadership is cultivated in similar ways around the world, in the combination of volunteering leaders & motivated workers.
We are trying hard to expand the editor community, thus I am curious about the paid editors part.
If only part of the editors are paid, What would the other editors think? How do you evaluate editor’s work by money in a fair way?
We are trying hard to expand the editor community, thus I am curious about the paid editors part.
If only part of the editors are paid, What would the other editors think? How do you evaluate editor’s work by money in a fair way?
we only have 1 editor for country, the otheres are journalist, so we paid more for the editor for the experience and the time that they invest in the project, so for be transparent we made a spreadsheet and we put: profile, experience (years), previous work, hours invest in the project, so thi si públic.
this is públic*
in the case of colombia, we received a grant from open sociaety fundation, and delegated tasks and functions, the person who had more tasks received more money, some of that not much was left over and we decided to invest it in the other team, we arranged more money to the teams that had more members and divided equally. But usually the one who works the most and has more experience receives more money.
A full volunteer project like Cofacts operates quite slowly, especially in the growth of editor quantity and the programming tasks is consumed very slowly
@jerome.developer.tw has joined the channel
@uvavaca Hi, I wonder that which part of process do you want to exploit the program to enhance? I also curious about how do you spread the fact checking message to your audience and reach the public?
Very good question, this is the part that we lack, because everything we do manual, what we did was that the general public registered whathsapp number as a newsletter, then we sent a massive message from that number to all registered, but it is manual.
We want to improve that process 1, the automatic response, because there is a person who responds one by one the messages and uploads them to check, when there are many they can not cope.
Also to spread the message we want it to be automatic, that part we still do not know how to do it.
We want to improve that process 1, the automatic response, because there is a person who responds one by one the messages and uploads them to check, when there are many they can not cope.
Also to spread the message we want it to be automatic, that part we still do not know how to do it.
I totally agree that automatic response of already fact-checked items are very important!
I have heard that WhatsApp has just launched their business API ( https://blog.whatsapp.com/10000648/Growing-our-Tools-for-Business ) and fact checkers in Brazil is already using it ( http://www.niemanlab.org/2018/08/whatsapp-is-a-black-box-of-viral-misinformation-but-in-brazil-24-newsrooms-are-teaming-up-to-fact-check-it/ ).
Personally I have not looked into it yet. Is auto-response doable with such API? cc/@caiosba
I have heard that WhatsApp has just launched their business API ( https://blog.whatsapp.com/10000648/Growing-our-Tools-for-Business ) and fact checkers in Brazil is already using it ( http://www.niemanlab.org/2018/08/whatsapp-is-a-black-box-of-viral-misinformation-but-in-brazil-24-newsrooms-are-teaming-up-to-fact-check-it/ ).
Personally I have not looked into it yet. Is auto-response doable with such API? cc/@caiosba
About comprova we don´t know, the only think that i know is they are powererd for facebook and google, and the web site is 100% similar to checkmedia.org . We are using whathsapp bussines whit méxican team, and we are tryin whit brasil, but we are exploring.
we do not have enough knowledge in that field
Bueno la verdad es que nosotros tenemos el componente de capacitación
2018-08-23
What we did was that initially we were all volunteers and I only paid the editor.
2. It worked that the girls saw that we the heads of the project did not receive money for it and we worked twice as much.
3. Also the free trainings, being in the team allowed access to the knowledge of meedan and allies, then we had webinars online.
2. It worked that the girls saw that we the heads of the project did not receive money for it and we worked twice as much.
3. Also the free trainings, being in the team allowed access to the knowledge of meedan and allies, then we had webinars online.
Very good question, this is the part that we lack, because everything we do manual, what we did was that the general public registered whathsapp number as a newsletter, then we sent a massive message from that number to all registered, but it is manual.
We want to improve that process 1, the automatic response, because there is a person who responds one by one the messages and uploads them to check, when there are many they can not cope.
Also to spread the message we want it to be automatic, that part we still do not know how to do it.
We want to improve that process 1, the automatic response, because there is a person who responds one by one the messages and uploads them to check, when there are many they can not cope.
Also to spread the message we want it to be automatic, that part we still do not know how to do it.
Hola!!!
明天晚上 OGP Summit 系列分享會第二場在派大星！有 @pm5 @bil @isabelhou 和環資的淑貞，歡迎報名！https://ocftw.kktix.cc/events/ogpsharing
【8/23 第二場】》聚焦各國案例：公民科技 x 不實訊息 x 環境
時間：8/23 (四) _ 19:00
地點：派大星Event Space (松山區八德路三段12巷16弄3號地下室)
【8/23 第二場】》聚焦各國案例：公民科技 x 不實訊息 x 環境
時間：8/23 (四) _ 19:00
地點：派大星Event Space (松山區八德路三段12巷16弄3號地下室)
ocftw.kktix.cc
全球最重要的"開放政府"夥伴大會，今年辦在唯一不發給臺灣人簽證的喬治亞共和國?! 突破萬難前進喬治亞參與大會的臺灣民間代表團，使盡全力在這重要個國際場合與全球交流公民參與、開放資料、開放政府各項經驗。
@caiosba has joined the channel
Thanks! It’s interesting to find that leadership is cultivated in similar ways around the world, in the combination of volunteering leaders & motivated workers.
We are trying hard to expand the editor community, thus I am curious about the paid editors part.
If only part of the editors are paid, What would the other editors think? How do you evaluate editor’s work by money in a fair way?
We are trying hard to expand the editor community, thus I am curious about the paid editors part.
If only part of the editors are paid, What would the other editors think? How do you evaluate editor’s work by money in a fair way?
@pm5 has joined the channel
Cofact on Nieman lab.
http://www.niemanlab.org/2018/08/line-is-another-chat-app-rife-with-spam-scams-and-bad-information-the-volunteer-supported-cofacts-is-fact-checking-them-in-the-open/
http://www.niemanlab.org/2018/08/line-is-another-chat-app-rife-with-spam-scams-and-bad-information-the-volunteer-supported-cofacts-is-fact-checking-them-in-the-open/
Nieman Lab
Users forward dubious messages to a chatbot; volunteer editors evaluate their credibility; the bot answers back to the user (and anyone wondering in the future).
I totally agree that automatic response of already fact-checked items are very important!
I have heard that WhatsApp has just launched their business API ( https://blog.whatsapp.com/10000648/Growing-our-Tools-for-Business ) and fact checkers in Brazil is already using it ( http://www.niemanlab.org/2018/08/whatsapp-is-a-black-box-of-viral-misinformation-but-in-brazil-24-newsrooms-are-teaming-up-to-fact-check-it/ ).
Personally I have not looked into it yet. Is auto-response doable with such API? cc/@caiosba
I have heard that WhatsApp has just launched their business API ( https://blog.whatsapp.com/10000648/Growing-our-Tools-for-Business ) and fact checkers in Brazil is already using it ( http://www.niemanlab.org/2018/08/whatsapp-is-a-black-box-of-viral-misinformation-but-in-brazil-24-newsrooms-are-teaming-up-to-fact-check-it/ ).
Personally I have not looked into it yet. Is auto-response doable with such API? cc/@caiosba
2018-08-24
we only have 1 editor for country, the otheres are journalist, so we paid more for the editor for the experience and the time that they invest in the project, so for be transparent we made a spreadsheet and we put: profile, experience (years), previous work, hours invest in the project, so thi si públic.
this is públic*
in the case of colombia, we received a grant from open sociaety fundation, and delegated tasks and functions, the person who had more tasks received more money, some of that not much was left over and we decided to invest it in the other team, we arranged more money to the teams that had more members and divided equally. But usually the one who works the most and has more experience receives more money.
About comprova we don´t know, the only think that i know is they are powererd for facebook and google, and the web site is 100% similar to checkmedia.org . We are using whathsapp bussines whit méxican team, and we are tryin whit brasil, but we are exploring.
we do not have enough knowledge in that field
So we are like 12 hours of difference rigth???
maybe above 12 hours? we are at UTC+8
maybe above 12 hours? we are at UTC+8
2018-08-26
Hola, lo único que he visto con el manejo del appi de whaths es esto que logré hacer hoy
WhatsApp.com
WhatsApp Messenger: More than 1 billion people in over 180 countries use WhatsApp to stay in touch with friends and family, anytime and anywhere. WhatsApp is free and offers simple, secure, reliable messaging and calling, available on phones all over the world.
@andyy0216 has joined the channel
2018-08-29
Hello i can help whit this if you want, is my think 🙂
@lucien I can give you a hand whit the UI
2018-08-30
週六參與小聚的成員迅速地寫好了報導
https://news.rti.org.tw/subject/view/id/1880
https://news.rti.org.tw/subject/view/id/1880
中央廣播電臺
「照電腦斷層會讓人病歪歪？」、「教科書教大家性解放？」、「中國網路開始整頓清理Line？」這些訊息，可能曾被傳送到您的L...
- 👍2
2018-08-31
前輩大大們好，fly最近也在做bot，發現轉傳還要搜尋對像很麻煩，靈機一動把使用者用兩個雙引號括起，bot排序馬上變第1位！因為引號的ascii只次於 ! 號。於是想推薦 cofact bot的admin把名字加上引號。
可為user免去搜尋真得假的的動作，實測不影響搜尋。
Cofacts 真的假的 | 轉傳查證 > "Cofacts 真的假的 | 轉傳查證"
可為user免去搜尋真得假的的動作，實測不影響搜尋。
Cofacts 真的假的 | 轉傳查證 > "Cofacts 真的假的 | 轉傳查證"
唯不知認証帳號是否有限制修改。一般的7天可變動一次 XD
認証帳號是否有限制修改 -> 確實有限制。另外，當初我們是 `.: 真的假的 - 轉傳訊息查證 :.`，但認證帳號在審查時會說不建議用奇怪符號。