cofacts

Month: 2022-01

2022-01-02

github2 01:15:54

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-site/pull/467|#467 Show blocked content only for blocked users>

Depends on API: <https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-api/pull/262|cofacts/rumors-api#262> This PR implements M3: • In the new API it will not show blocked content by default • This PR allows blocked user to see blocked content (reply request, article reply, article category) on article page *Normal user* Note: there is 1 scammer comment in the image -- we forgot to ban the user previously. Block them here: <https://github.com/cofacts/takedowns/pull/35/files?short_path=bcf97d9#diff-bcf97d9ee9386930d59f50144c9d0d8d90dbbeb775a27af646d41729cc055c80|https://github.com/cofacts/takedowns/pull/35/files?short_path=bcf97d9#diff-bcf97d9ee9386930d59f50144c9d0d8d90dbbeb775a27af646d41729cc055c80> <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/108608/147856084-a36276cf-24f9-41a1-8c3a-4296e92b8193.png|圖片> *Blocked user* All blocked contents are shown if and only if the browser is owned by a blocked user. <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/108608/147856110-0dd604b5-bdbd-4928-b291-8046b1b8922b.png|圖片>

:white_check_mark: All checks have passed

github2 01:17:51

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-site/pull/467#issuecomment-1003588186|Comment on #467 Show blocked content only for blocked users>

<https://coveralls.io/builds/45317611|Coverage Status> Coverage remained the same at 75.363% when pulling *<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-site/commit/cf550a0ca17a8b6b44f7839454b1758704e701c0|cf550a0> on load-blocked* into *<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-site/commit/0edcdb9eda6e14c2d04cc63c1d1d9e20d4beea78|0edcdb9> on master*.

cai 13:16:08
https://cofacts.tw/article/1z4mfcu1f1dy1
https://cofacts.tw/article/37v1rhs7qwi4w
https://cofacts.tw/article/3kpl5ucl2s8j8
https://cofacts.tw/article/37egvhb6pxzwf
https://cofacts.tw/article/at7dlzb0erlf
https://cofacts.tw/article/s60ndd1lxxa7
https://cofacts.tw/article/2rfcramdl3lif
https://cofacts.tw/article/3ehcgvlb6ey02
https://cofacts.tw/article/1pwruw3gw1xo5
https://cofacts.tw/article/222uijnqk7e4g
這幾篇應該是講一樣的東西
解答應該如這篇講的是`青島電視塔AR燈光秀`,地標是對的,但是查不到相關新聞,新聞只有查到中國多地取消跨年活動
不錯的創作呀 XD
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbvRMKxh5TQ
這個版本有最後的 logo
「市南區文化和旅遊局」
「金東數字雙翼」
但也沒在市南區文化和旅遊局的官方微博
我不懂中國的官方宣傳
https://weibo.com/u/2210514455
我有個大膽ㄉ想法
這是金東數字創意做給中國地方政府的提案
但沒有採用之類
但他們去年元宵也有做一份
到底
感謝 @iacmai ~~
感覺可以補上新回應,加入 TFC 查證作為佐證資料
😮 1
github2 16:02:32

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-db/pull/56|#56 Add articleType and attachment for non-text articles>

Stores non-text messages in separate articles Spec: <https://g0v.hackmd.io/aJqHn8f5QGuBDLSMH_EinA|https://g0v.hackmd.io/aJqHn8f5QGuBDLSMH_EinA> Make sure update schema before release ``` npm run reload -- articles ```

2022-01-03

github2 00:04:36

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-db/pull/56#discussion_r777227783|Comment on #56 Add articleType and attachment for non-text articles>

Question: will there be multiple attachments? If not, we can consider using `attachmentUrl` + `attachmentHash` instead.

2022-01-04

mrorz 11:22:55
我在準備 spreadsheet 來呈現資料庫裡的 blocked users & blocked reply requests
之前的 spam monitor 的做法是,會拿已有的最新資料時間點為基準,每次僅插入該時間點以後的新的資料。

但由於把資料設成 blocked 的時間可能會晚於建立時間,以往用最新時間掃 data to block 的機制,會掃不到較早建立但(因為回報較晚所以)比較晚被設為 blocked 的內容。

這樣一來,這種掃資料然後塞進 spreadsheet 的做法好像不太適合,或許改成放在 community builder ,在有人看的時候即時呼叫 API 列出來會比較合適這樣

cofacts.github.io

Community Builder

Web site created using create-react-app

github2 13:32:20

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-api/pull/273#discussion_r777832663|Comment on #273 Multimedia support phase 0>

Question: should we migrate all existing articles to have `articleType` = `TEXT` after deploying it? Seems that a simple curl command can do this.

github2 13:32:20

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-api/pull/273#discussion_r777831828|Comment on #273 Multimedia support phase 0>

nit: I think we can 1. Add a resolver that resolves to `TEXT` if `articleType` does not exist for the document 2. Add `GraphQLNonNull` to its type so that client can know it cannot be `null` 3. Remove `LINE` from description because we may collect `article` from other channels as well

github2 13:32:20

Review on #273 Multimedia support phase 0

Thanks for the implementation! I have not looked into `CreateMediaArticle`, but have some early nitpicking comments / comments over surrounding code changes.

github2 14:33:12

<https://github.com/cofacts/community-builder/pull/6|#6 Fix editor works pagination>

Fixes pagination of Feedbacks &amp; Comments page under Editor Works. • It is fixed by applying relay style pagination to `ListReplyRequests` and `ListArticleReplyFeedbacks`. • This consolidates `fetchMore` results into the same filter, causing `edges.length` to grow correctly after `fetchMore` returns • Hide pagination buttons when `fetchMore` so that `DataGrid`'s page stat can match component's max page loading state *Screenshot* List of feedback: can go to next page now. <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/108608/148018720-7ad4df14-ddc9-45e7-9008-fc629a7141a8.gif|paginate> This also applies to "comments".

2022-01-05

github2 02:38:34

<https://github.com/cofacts/community-builder/pull/7|#7 GitHub actions>

Replace travis with github actions

:white_check_mark: All checks have passed

mrorz 13:19:37
今日會議記錄:小聚 rundown,以及測試「把 blocked reply request 藏起來」的功能
https://g0v.hackmd.io/RtKFTKRFRduJK0gz3St3lQ

g0v.hackmd.io

20220105 會議記錄 - HackMD

詐騙關鍵字: `財富自由`

避開垃圾訊息:關掉iMessage
https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/iOS/M.1640258161.A.AE0.html
https://www.dcard.tw/f/talk/p/237565415
有待iphone使用者見證?
會晚大概 10 分鐘開始唷
line挖礦那間有公司登記了,他把回應寫的錯誤都解了XD
療效產品 提告詐騙的
https://www.tellows.tw/num/0911511101 留言很精采
https://news.ebc.net.tw/news/society/286762 新聞有報過
https://law.moeasmea.gov.tw/ailt/modules/forum/details/?topic_id=32864
這篇回應說可以蒐集證據提告恐嚇XD

2022-01-06

github2 00:00:41

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-site/issues/468|#468 Cannot read property status of undefined/null expression>

View details in Rollbar: <https://rollbar.com/mrorz/rumors-site/items/1536/|https://rollbar.com/mrorz/rumors-site/items/1536/> ``` TypeError: Cannot read property 'status' of undefined File "/srv/www/.next/server/static/9Wf1MTRmgW4434AwlMHwg/pages/reply/[id].js", line 2750, in ReplyPage const isDeleted = originalArticleReply.status === 'DELETED'; File "/srv/www/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-server.node.production.min.js", line 33, in c function Sa(a,b,d){function c(c,f){var e=ma(f,b,d),g=[],h=!1,l={isMounted:function(){return!1},enqueueForceUpdate:function(){if(null===g)return null},enqueueReplaceState:function(a,b){h=!0;g=[b]},enqueueSetState:function(a,b){if(null===g)return null;g.push(b)}},k=void 0;if(f.prototype&amp;&amp;f.prototype.isReactComponent){if(k=new f(c.props,e,l),"function"===typeof f.getDerivedStateFromProps){var t=f.getDerivedStateFromProps.call(null,c.props,k.state);null!=t&amp;&amp;(k.state=p({},k.state,t))}}else if(N={},k=f(c.props, File "/srv/www/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-server.node.production.min.js", line 36, in Sa c(f,e)}return{child:a,context:b}} File "/srv/www/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-server.node.production.min.js", line 41, in a.render D}else{var l=g.children[g.childIndex++],k="";try{k+=this.render(l,g.context,g.domNamespace)}catch(t){throw t;}finally{}f.length&lt;=this.suspenseDepth&amp;&amp;f.push("");f[this.suspenseDepth]+=k}}return f[0]}finally{Ja.current=c,X=b}};a.prototype.render=function(a,d,c){if("string"===typeof a||"number"===typeof a){c=""+a;if(""===c)return"";if(this.makeStaticMarkup)return M(c);if(this.previousWasTextNode)return"\x3c!-- --\x3e"+M(c);this.previousWasTextNode=!0;return M(c)}d=Sa(a,d,this.threadID);a=d.child;d=d.context; File "/srv/www/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-server.node.production.min.js", line 41, in a.read D}else{var l=g.children[g.childIndex++],k="";try{k+=this.render(l,g.context,g.domNamespace)}catch(t){throw t;}finally{}f.length&lt;=this.suspenseDepth&amp;&amp;f.push("");f[this.suspenseDepth]+=k}}return f[0]}finally{Ja.current=c,X=b}};a.prototype.render=function(a,d,c){if("string"===typeof a||"number"===typeof a){c=""+a;if(""===c)return"";if(this.makeStaticMarkup)return M(c);if(this.previousWasTextNode)return"\x3c!-- --\x3e"+M(c);this.previousWasTextNode=!0;return M(c)}d=Sa(a,d,this.threadID);a=d.child;d=d.context; File "/srv/www/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-server.node.production.min.js", line 53, in renderToString return b}(aa.Readable),Wa={renderToString:function(a){a=new Ta(a,!1);try{return a.read(Infinity)}finally{a.destroy()}},renderToStaticMarkup:function(a){a=new Ta(a,!0);try{return a.read(Infinity)}finally{a.destroy()}},renderToNodeStream:function(a){return new Va(a,!1)},renderToStaticNodeStream:function(a){return new Va(a,!0)},version:"16.8.6"},Xa={default:Wa},Ya=Xa&amp;&amp;Wa||Xa;module.exports=Ya.default||Ya; File "/srv/www/node_modules/next/dist/next-server/server/render.js", line 83, in render html = renderElementToString(element); File "/srv/www/node_modules/next/dist/next-server/server/render.js", line 406, in renderPage return render(renderElementToString, react_1.default.createElement(AppContainer, null, File "/srv/www/.next/server/static/9Wf1MTRmgW4434AwlMHwg/pages/_document.js", line 255, in Object.ctx.renderPage ctx.renderPage = () =&gt; originalRenderPage({ File "/srv/www/.next/server/static/9Wf1MTRmgW4434AwlMHwg/pages/_document.js", line 629, in Function.getInitialProps } = await ctx.renderPage({ ```

github2 00:16:28

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-site/issues/468#issuecomment-1005867982|Comment on #468 Cannot read property status of undefined/null expression>

*Steps to reproduce* • VIsit a reply detail page with all its article replies deleted: <https://dev.cofacts.tw/reply/_A44ZHEBrhVJn3LN9SdD|https://dev.cofacts.tw/reply/_A44ZHEBrhVJn3LN9SdD> *Root cause* 1. In the <https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-api/pull/262|new API>, The `articleReplies` resolvers will only return `NORMAL` article replies by default. 2. Reply detail page rendering logic expects there should be at least 1 article reply to function properly. It is the case when we return both `NORMAL` and `DELETED` reply, but is no longer the case in the new API. *Proposed fix* • Also query`DELETED` article replies so that original render logic would work • For future `BLOCKED` article replies, render a minimal reply detail page (so that blocked user will not notice &amp; for displaying this blocked content), but specify that the content should not be indexed by search engines (so that spams don't get boosted)

github2 00:33:13

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-site/pull/469|#469 [Reply] reply detail page should work for DELETED &amp; BLOCKED content>

See analysis in <https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-site/issues/468#issuecomment-1005867982|#468 (comment)> Fixes <https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-site/issues/468|#468> . *Screenshots* *Current* Reply detail page of deleted reply will trigger internal server error: <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/108608/148253307-a2ac8051-0181-4488-bba6-0b2089e941ae.png|圖片> *Fixed* Deleted reply can be properly displayed <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/108608/148253405-d594d69a-8934-4336-9b6a-e9dffdf49539.png|圖片> Blocked reply (spam content) can be displayed in a minimalist fashion for public display, but do not allow web crawler to index (Simulated by forcefully enter if statement) <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/108608/148253590-b9edbda0-1504-405d-a044-5255c473adb1.png|圖片>

:white_check_mark: All checks have passed

信箱挖到了新 API 導致 deleted reply 的 reply detail 顯示不出來的問題
這個是 solution 唷煩請 review
mrorz 00:34:12
信箱挖到了新 API 導致 deleted reply 的 reply detail 顯示不出來的問題
這個是 solution 唷煩請 review
github2 00:50:28

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-site/pull/469#issuecomment-1005895429|Comment on #469 [Reply] reply detail page should work for DELETED &amp; BLOCKED content>

<https://coveralls.io/builds/45397637|Coverage Status> Coverage remained the same at 74.692% when pulling *<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-site/commit/b79669d313261126125d47fa063a92ce2ab80f87|b79669d> on fix-reply-detail* into *<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-site/commit/46a813bef8dee656e8504df0289919a400aec753|46a813b> on master*.

github2 13:26:53

Review on #273 Multimedia support phase 0

LGTM! The tests for CreateMediaArticle covers every aspect and looks pretty solid :muscle: Just 2 additional comments.

github2 13:26:54

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-api/pull/273#discussion_r779303247|Comment on #273 Multimedia support phase 0>

Since we actually don't parallelize anything here, we can do ordinary async await in this resolver to simplify stuff. ``` const articleId = await createNewMediaArticle(...); // This "await" here is optional. But it should not take more than a few milliseconds to wait for reply request creation.... await createOrUpdateReplyRequest({ articleId, user, reason }); return { id: articleId }; ```

github2 13:26:54

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-api/pull/273#discussion_r779297817|Comment on #273 Multimedia support phase 0>

nit: since the logic of search hit is much shorter, I think we can do early return for the search hit case to reduce the indent of code (which reduces the mental load of "there is an else branch" when reading the code) ``` if(matchedArticle.hits.total) { return matchedArticle.hits.hits[0]._id; } // The rest of code ```

cai 17:07:33
https://www.facebook.com/165bear/posts/4867501326642662
https://165.npa.gov.tw/#/article/news/460
165終於公布試住員是詐騙了

facebook.com

Log in or sign up to view

See posts, photos and more on Facebook.

2

2022-01-07

mrorz 13:02:20
預設把 blocked content 隱藏的 API,今天凌晨已經上線囉
現在還看得到的 spam,就是還沒回報過、被標為 blocked 的 spam XD
👍 1 1
cai 21:33:55
是不是有人固定丟 cofacts.org / reply 來問?
@andyy0216 有發現他是跟之前亂送關鍵字的是同一個人
https://old.cofacts.tw/articles?searchUserByArticleId=2kd7upbb3fsb0&filter=all&replyRequestCount=1

我想說放著不理他先,看起來十幾天會來發作一次 (?)
就跟VPN 文固定會有廣告一樣?
或是他單純覺得丟很多垃圾給編輯忙很好玩(?
cai 22:02:51
你們要把訊息選擇分類會很lag 嗎
4000 22:03:02
4000 22:04:01
不過不用等他 重整就會上去了
1 1 1
cai 22:04:01
那看來不是我網路問題,我還以為是我電腦又再跑windows更新
cai 23:02:26
https://cofacts.tw/article/1xe57cs1utbnv
https://cofacts.tw/article/31m49a57fz26p
這篇好像是簡書上的創作文....

简书

一个国家总统的恋爱悲剧

一个国家总统,和一个普通百姓秘密恋爱了五年,最后的结局令人心酸落泪。下面,我来讲这个恋爱的悲剧。 经过38年的努力,2013年2月25日,朴槿惠正式当选韩国历史上第一位女总统...

確實把朴槿惠與「高英男」寫在一起的,都是同一篇文章
所以是虛構故事沒錯呢
1

2022-01-08

cai 11:06:50
https://cofacts.tw/reply/SqTXNn4BnX5-aOa4wa-8
https://cofacts.tw/reply/SaTTNn4BnX5-aOa4Bq-2
奇怪的回應???
2017 的老訊息
https://cofacts.tw/article/AV_KDSDtyCdS-nWhujVO

但他發問在另外兩篇下面也是滿煩的,只好給 downvote
cai 12:33:07
去年初疫情消息混現在的消息好煩 😥
https://cofacts.tw/article/jsu8n2j9lndy
這則應該是去年混今年的
1. 最近的桃機群聚相關足跡的確有永和豆漿大王
2. 台北燈節延期跟年貨大街取消是2021/1/20
3. 新北這個到底要算今年還去年阿 :rolling_on_the_floor_laughing:
針對燈節跟年貨大街,確實應該是假訊息
但如果是我回的話,我會特別說「截至 2022/1/9」 政府尚未公告這樣
以防之後政府宣佈 XD
😢 3

2022-01-09

cai 13:30:39
https://cofacts.tw/article/jsu8n2j9lndy
這則應該是去年混今年的
1. 最近的桃機群聚相關足跡的確有永和豆漿大王
2. 台北燈節延期跟年貨大街取消是2021/1/20
3. 新北這個到底要算今年還去年阿 :rolling_on_the_floor_laughing:
mrorz 16:30:46
筆記 2:更新 API 後加分類,按下「新增標記」後好像不會再呈現在網頁裡了
應該是 bug QQ
aa39998 17:03:09
@aa39998 has joined the channel
👋 1

2022-01-10

2022-01-11

cai 12:59:08
https://cofacts.tw/article/1hwp30w1fa0l9
https://finance.ettoday.net/news/2165779
非公家機關的抽獎活動要算在正確訊息還是不在查核範圍 🤔
都可以 XD
選不在查證範圍(沒有出處框)的話,還是可以直接附連結在內文
cai 19:16:33
最近應該會需要這個,但是過陣子網址就會變所以僅供參考XDD
嚴重特殊傳染性肺炎(COVID-19)第二級疫情警戒標準及防疫措施裁罰規定(111年1月11日版)
沒戴口罩拍照被罰6萬我記得是老謠言,場景很多變化
我一開始想到的是二級不是規勸為主嗎,三級才是直接罰
罰6萬是三級期間的非營業場所5人以上群聚
傳染病防治法第 67 條第 l 項第 2 款規定,處新臺幣 6 萬元以上 30 萬元以下罰鍰。
因應 COVID-19 第三級疫情警戒相關措施及裁罰規定表 110.05.26 修正
新聞: https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/society/breakingnews/3656628
對對
上面這兩篇我回掉囉
雖然《嚴重特殊傳染性肺炎(COVID-19)第二級疫情警戒標準及防疫措施裁罰規定》有超多版本,但每個點進去的未戴口罩罰則都一樣(因為法源相同)所以我就不寫版本惹
我本來想貼這個新聞嚇嚇傳這個的人
「沒人因為沒戴口罩而罰 6 萬,但亂傳疫情假訊息最高罰 300 萬ㄛ」
https://www.ettoday.net/news/20210524/1989416.htm
想想還是不要好了我們很和善
1 1
mrorz 21:33:17
查核中心認證
https://www.facebook.com/216153715706427/posts/949919735663151/

facebook.com

Log in or sign up to view

See posts, photos and more on Facebook.

😆 1

2022-01-12

mrorz 03:18:27
本周議程
https://g0v.hackmd.io/@mrorz/cofacts-meeting-notes/%2FSETMQ8DaQDu3a5ZYnrvfpA

HackMD

Cofacts 會議記錄 - HackMD

# Cofacts 會議記錄 ## 2022 - [20220112 會議記錄](/SETMQ8DaQDu3a5ZYnrvfpA) - [20220105 會議記錄](/RtKFTKRFRduJ

對對,有說公開

2022-01-13

github2 13:17:55

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-fb-bot/pull/28|#28 Bump follow-redirects from 1.5.5 to 1.14.7>

Bumps <https://github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects|follow-redirects> from 1.5.5 to 1.14.7. Commits • <https://github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects/commit/2ede36d7c60d3acdcd324dcd99a9dbd52e4fb3a6|`2ede36d`> Release version 1.14.7 of the npm package. • <https://github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects/commit/8b347cbcef7c7b72a6e9be20f5710c17d6163c22|`8b347cb`> Drop Cookie header across domains. • <https://github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects/commit/6f5029ae1a0fdab4dc25f6379a5ee303c2319070|`6f5029a`> Release version 1.14.6 of the npm package. • <https://github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects/commit/af706bee57de954414c0bde0a9f33e62beea3e52|`af706be`> Ignore null headers. • <https://github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects/commit/d01ab7a5c5df3617c7a40a03de7af6427fdfac55|`d01ab7a`> Release version 1.14.5 of the npm package. • <https://github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects/commit/40052ea8aa13559becee5795715c1d45b1f0eb76|`40052ea`> Make compatible with Node 17. • <https://github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects/commit/86f7572f9365dadc39f85916259b58973819617f|`86f7572`> Fix: clear internal timer on request abort to avoid leakage • <https://github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects/commit/2e1eaf0218c5315a2ab27f53964d0535d4dafb51|`2e1eaf0`> Keep Authorization header on subdomain redirects. • <https://github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects/commit/2ad9e82b6277ae2104f7770e9ff1186cc6da29d4|`2ad9e82`> Carry over Host header on relative redirects (<https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects/issues/172|#172>) • <https://github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects/commit/77e2a581e1d1811674b7b74745a9c20a5b939488|`77e2a58`> Release version 1.14.4 of the npm package. • Additional commits viewable in <https://github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects/compare/v1.5.5...v1.14.7|compare view> <https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores|Dependabot compatibility score> Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. * * * Dependabot commands and options You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: • `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR • `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it • `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it • `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it • `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging • `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed • `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually • `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) • `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) • `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) • `@dependabot use these labels` will set the current labels as the default for future PRs for this repo and language • `@dependabot use these reviewers` will set the current reviewers as the default for future PRs for this repo and language • `@dependabot use these assignees` will set the current assignees as the default for future PRs for this repo and language • `@dependabot use this milestone` will set the current milestone as the default for future PRs for this repo and language You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the <https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-fb-bot/network/alerts|Security Alerts page>.

github2 13:45:59

<https://github.com/cofacts/takedowns/pull/36|#36 Remove Alvagrado Alicia, wongkoona pimnipa and xiwieili>

赫然發現以前就放進 spam monitor 的忘記公告,所以一併處理 XDD
mrorz 13:58:10
赫然發現以前就放進 spam monitor 的忘記公告,所以一併處理 XDD
github2 14:36:14

<https://github.com/cofacts/takedowns/pull/32#issuecomment-1011839009|Comment on #32 Add 2 scammers>

Included in <https://github.com/cofacts/takedowns/pull/36|#36>

github2 14:58:27

<https://github.com/cofacts/takedowns/pull/37|#37 Block Yingtao Wan>

檢查的時候發現那四篇訊息裡面其實還有其他 VPN spam 囧
mrorz 17:46:11
才剛決定 deprioritize spam 然後就湧入一堆手動處理不完的 spam⋯⋯
https://cofacts.tw/article/h5kz65nt8r6y
😮 1

2022-01-14

cai 21:03:10
https://cofacts.tw/article/37r4s8i73gsd6 這個我有在IG限時動態發現廣告,會盜用勞動部的logo,忘記截圖了 😆
Nice catch!! 讚讚

2022-01-15

Katie Kurata 00:53:40
@ktchieko has joined the channel
cai 12:12:06
二次詐騙現在改往`台灣政治政黨`分類嗎
有按讚應該也是他自己按的,補充有可以按自己讚的bug
https://cofacts.tw/article/2cfs4rwqmpnsx
https://cofacts.tw/article/bor0dg2b9wf7
https://cofacts.tw/article/3ppeiqj59yffi
同一位,他留蠻多篇的,懶得全貼上來
😮 2

2022-01-16