Slack archive

cofacts

Month: 2022-08

2022-08-03

cai 22:37:54
https://cofacts.tw/article/2742uwo9vu2q
看裡面的網址原本以為去詐騙，丟去 expand url 發現還真的是連結到google表單
瑪家鄉公所的FB宣傳文也是用這個縮網址
為什麼會想用xyz結尾的網址啦 😅
image.png
😂 2

2022-08-04

cai 22:10:29
本日熱門：9400萬系列文
https://cofacts.tw/article/3b220f4vuifrz
https://cofacts.tw/article/3u4h4j1wr1ars
https://cofacts.tw/article/3iu7rmxas4div

這不確定是否同系列，連結的影片好像沒提到500萬？
https://cofacts.tw/article/1biwny9qa3fk4
https://cofacts.tw/article/uz7dnscjkcfk

外交部澄清稿後的
https://cofacts.tw/article/44nel0vjz9ma
https://cofacts.tw/article/3nx4mdh1jb7yf
https://cofacts.tw/article/z9mkno4x6phm
原來後續政論節目有接手呀
想到可以查得方向應該有
1. 我國該筆預算過去編列到現在的狀況是否有所增減，尤其是橫跨不同執政黨時期
2. 該筆資料據說出自美國開放資料。那跟其他國家（ex: 以色列）相比，我國花在遊說的前有特別多嗎？
或是看美國台灣觀測站或其他粉專
之前是不是有寫過政治遊說科普文
今天又有一篇新的，然後又被發現是盜帳的
6月的也有相關話題，針對聯合報的
https://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=99&s=98019
> 我國駐美代表處聘用公關公司協助推動強化台美關係，是我國政府長年的一貫作法，跨越不同政黨的政府皆同，並非單一政黨所獨創或獨有的運作。公關公司在美國為我國進行遊說工作，一向嚴格遵守相關法律，其預算也由我國立法院進行完整、合法、公開透明的監督。近年來相關預算的支出規模大致持平，外交部也會依據實際需要進行微調。
https://www.upmedia.mg/news_info.php?Type=2&SerialNo=147468
https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=6590&pid=215457
中天的政論節目是8/2，八卦板那篇是8/4
咦？原來是政論節目先，八卦版後？
外交部澄清稿第二篇
https://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=1163&s=98258
> 網傳公關公司文件資料是假造圖片，包括表格內容及負責人的簽名均是偽造。
事實查核中心的檔案列表是 FARA 的 filing system 列表

如果是想要看 by foreign principal 的統計，其實可以直接看 FARA Reports to Congress
https://www.justice.gov/nsd-fara/fara-reports-congress

每半年有一個報告，我正在把 20202H2 挑幾個國家出來打成表
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QE9x2VME12YWqYNayfRxERyjVZHnbYxpEnaEvrORGaU/edit
cai 22:10:29
本日熱門：9400萬系列文
https://cofacts.tw/article/3b220f4vuifrz
https://cofacts.tw/article/3u4h4j1wr1ars
https://cofacts.tw/article/3iu7rmxas4div

這不確定是否同系列，連結的影片好像沒提到500萬？
https://cofacts.tw/article/1biwny9qa3fk4
https://cofacts.tw/article/uz7dnscjkcfk

外交部澄清稿後的
https://cofacts.tw/article/44nel0vjz9ma
https://cofacts.tw/article/3nx4mdh1jb7yf
https://cofacts.tw/article/z9mkno4x6phm
原來後續政論節目有接手呀
想到可以查得方向應該有
1. 我國該筆預算過去編列到現在的狀況是否有所增減，尤其是橫跨不同執政黨時期
2. 該筆資料據說出自美國開放資料。那跟其他國家（ex: 以色列）相比，我國花在遊說的前有特別多嗎？
或是看美國台灣觀測站或其他粉專
之前是不是有寫過政治遊說科普文
今天又有一篇新的，然後又被發現是盜帳的
6月的也有相關話題，針對聯合報的
https://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=99&s=98019
> 我國駐美代表處聘用公關公司協助推動強化台美關係，是我國政府長年的一貫作法，跨越不同政黨的政府皆同，並非單一政黨所獨創或獨有的運作。公關公司在美國為我國進行遊說工作，一向嚴格遵守相關法律，其預算也由我國立法院進行完整、合法、公開透明的監督。近年來相關預算的支出規模大致持平，外交部也會依據實際需要進行微調。
https://www.upmedia.mg/news_info.php?Type=2&SerialNo=147468
https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=6590&pid=215457
中天的政論節目是8/2，八卦板那篇是8/4
咦？原來是政論節目先，八卦版後？
外交部澄清稿第二篇
https://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=1163&s=98258
> 網傳公關公司文件資料是假造圖片，包括表格內容及負責人的簽名均是偽造。
事實查核中心的檔案列表是 FARA 的 filing system 列表

如果是想要看 by foreign principal 的統計，其實可以直接看 FARA Reports to Congress
https://www.justice.gov/nsd-fara/fara-reports-congress

每半年有一個報告，我正在把 20202H2 挑幾個國家出來打成表
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QE9x2VME12YWqYNayfRxERyjVZHnbYxpEnaEvrORGaU/edit

2022-08-05

github2 01:57:56

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-site/pull/499#issuecomment-1205590513|Comment on #499 Include LIFF stats in article page>

Updated according to <https://g0v.hackmd.io/@mrorz/cofacts-meeting-notes/%2F6gLsmuTUQia3sjyYPPcFvQ|meeting discussion> <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/108608/182918507-60654179-2925-4a2b-b327-51f9f4a83a91.png|image> <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/108608/182918534-4dfccae9-45fd-49f3-a5fa-752f2883a845.png|image> <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/108608/182918681-8a863e10-3541-4ca3-8c50-dc446618eadb.png|image> <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/108608/182918712-7a231ec1-b654-4871-b803-4f3f312171e6.png|image>

github2 01:57:56

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-site/pull/499#issuecomment-1205590513|Comment on #499 Include LIFF stats in article page>

Updated according to <https://g0v.hackmd.io/@mrorz/cofacts-meeting-notes/%2F6gLsmuTUQia3sjyYPPcFvQ|meeting discussion> <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/108608/182918507-60654179-2925-4a2b-b327-51f9f4a83a91.png|image> <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/108608/182918534-4dfccae9-45fd-49f3-a5fa-752f2883a845.png|image> <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/108608/182918681-8a863e10-3541-4ca3-8c50-dc446618eadb.png|image> <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/108608/182918712-7a231ec1-b654-4871-b803-4f3f312171e6.png|image>

mrorz 16:49:44
在「張景明」之後
現在一直洗的換成「呂尚傑」
https://cofacts.github.io/community-builder/#/editorworks?showAll=1&day=365&userId=aFQPbYIBZ4FY5vnA-lMv

cofacts.github.io

Community Builder

Web site created using create-react-app

mrorz 17:06:26
中研院在 KDD 有篇 paper 是關於用 AI 生成 counterfactual explanations for fake claims
https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.04869
https://github.com/yilihsu/AsktoKnowMore

arXiv.org

Ask to Know More: Generating Counterfactual Explanations for Fake Claims

Automated fact checking systems have been proposed that quickly provide veracity prediction at scale to mitigate the negative influence of fake news on people and on public opinion. However, most...

yilihsu/AsktoKnowMore

Ask to Know More: Counterfactual Explanations for Fake Claims source code

mrorz 17:06:26
中研院在 KDD 有篇 paper 是關於用 AI 生成 counterfactual explanations for fake claims
https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.04869
https://github.com/yilihsu/AsktoKnowMore
mrorz 23:42:41
事實查核中心的檔案列表是 FARA 的 filing system 列表

如果是想要看 by foreign principal 的統計，其實可以直接看 FARA Reports to Congress
https://www.justice.gov/nsd-fara/fara-reports-congress

每半年有一個報告，我正在把 20202H2 挑幾個國家出來打成表
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QE9x2VME12YWqYNayfRxERyjVZHnbYxpEnaEvrORGaU/edit
😮 2

2022-08-07

github2 14:57:43

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-line-bot/pull/316|#316 Feature/image search>

1. Implement processImage 2. Remove old image related code: tesseract-ocr, GDrive 3. Extract postback event function as a standalone handler 4. Remove isSkipUser paramater by directly calling `handlePostback`

github2 14:57:43

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-line-bot/pull/316|#316 Feature/image search>

*Changes* 1. Implement processImage, fixes <https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-line-bot/issues/304|#304> 2. Remove old image related code: tesseract-ocr, GDrive 3. Extract postback event function as a standalone handler • Input(text) -&gt; `handleInput` -&gt; return buttons that will trigger `handlePostback` • Input(image) -&gt; `processImage` -&gt; return buttons that will trigger `handlePostback` • Input(postback) -&gt; `handlePostback` 4. Remove isSkipUser (only used in `initState`) parameter by directly calling `handlePostback` *Snapshots* <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6376572/183279240-d72dce87-c366-4050-b989-c3927a7bb100.png|https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6376572/183279240-d72dce87-c366-4050-b989-c3927a7bb100.png> <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6376572/183279242-7a99b590-d773-4e0d-b764-479262af57ca.png|https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6376572/183279242-7a99b590-d773-4e0d-b764-479262af57ca.png> <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6376572/183279246-e642c1ce-a2bd-4d5d-b29b-730bf6f41ea2.png|https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6376572/183279246-e642c1ce-a2bd-4d5d-b29b-730bf6f41ea2.png>

:white_check_mark: All checks have passed

github2 15:00:35

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-line-bot/pull/316#issuecomment-1207344621|Comment on #316 Feature/image search>

*Pull Request Test Coverage Report for <https://coveralls.io/builds/51470788|Build 2811714669>* • *83* of *106* *(78.3%)* changed or added relevant lines in *11* files are covered. • *4* unchanged lines in *2* files lost coverage. • Overall coverage increased (+*5.8%*) to *91.292%* * * * * * * *:yellow_heart: - <https://coveralls.io|Coveralls>*

github2 15:00:35

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-line-bot/pull/316#issuecomment-1207344621|Comment on #316 Feature/image search>

*Pull Request Test Coverage Report for <https://coveralls.io/builds/51470788|Build 2811714669>* • *83* of *106* *(78.3%)* changed or added relevant lines in *11* files are covered. • *4* unchanged lines in *2* files lost coverage. • Overall coverage increased (+*5.8%*) to *91.292%* * * * * * * *:yellow_heart: - <https://coveralls.io|Coveralls>*

github2 18:04:07

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-api/pull/290|#290 fetchStatsFromGA script now warns about sampled data>

When back filling old analytics data, we found that the fetched LIFF stats are inconsistent with the numbers on Google Analytics. We can reproduce this on local machine, and found that the inaccuracy only happens when the data is sampled: <https://developers.google.com/analytics/devguides/reporting/core/v4/basics#sampling|https://developers.google.com/analytics/devguides/reporting/core/v4/basics#sampling> If we specify a shorter date range when running the script, the inconsistency will be gone. This PR adds a warning message when sampled data is detected from the Google Analytics Reporting API response. <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/108608/183285758-e32e57a5-6533-48d3-96ad-c0e4e5b6bfbf.png|圖片>

github2 18:04:07

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-api/pull/290|#290 fetchStatsFromGA script now warns about sampled data>

When back filling old analytics data, we found that the fetched LIFF stats are inconsistent with the numbers on Google Analytics. We can reproduce this on local machine, and found that the inaccuracy only happens when the data is sampled: <https://developers.google.com/analytics/devguides/reporting/core/v4/basics#sampling|https://developers.google.com/analytics/devguides/reporting/core/v4/basics#sampling> If we specify a shorter date range when running the script, the inconsistency will be gone. This PR adds a warning message when sampled data is detected from the Google Analytics Reporting API response. <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/108608/183285758-e32e57a5-6533-48d3-96ad-c0e4e5b6bfbf.png|圖片> Sampling should only happens when we manually back-fill the data. The hourly cron job should not have that much of data that triggers Google Analytics samplng.

:white_check_mark: All checks have passed

github2 18:06:18

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-api/pull/290#issuecomment-1207373115|Comment on #290 fetchStatsFromGA script now warns about sampled data>

<https://coveralls.io/builds/51471855|Coverage Status> Coverage increased (+0.01%) to 87.768% when pulling *<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-api/commit/4aac44c901ef46b5e512909c22b5a492b74bca76|4aac44c> on warn-about-sampled* into *<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-api/commit/985911c62e94f6d15e330f61d9bc1d05d9263480|985911c> on master*.

github2 18:06:18

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-api/pull/290#issuecomment-1207373115|Comment on #290 fetchStatsFromGA script now warns about sampled data>

<https://coveralls.io/builds/51471855|Coverage Status> Coverage increased (+0.01%) to 87.768% when pulling *<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-api/commit/4aac44c901ef46b5e512909c22b5a492b74bca76|4aac44c> on warn-about-sampled* into *<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-api/commit/985911c62e94f6d15e330f61d9bc1d05d9263480|985911c> on master*.

2022-08-08

github2 16:58:53

Review on #7 Documentation

:+1::+1::+1:

github2 16:58:53

Review on #7 Documentation

:+1::+1::+1:

2022-08-09

cai 12:39:17
登入後不是會自動切換 `cofacts.tw` 嗎
這幾天發生的情況，如果在 firefox 登入後網址再切到 `cofacts.g0v.tw` 會等於沒有登入，但是切回到 `cofacts.tw` 就還是有登入的狀態，chrome 沒有這種情況。
cai 12:39:17
登入後不是會自動切換 `cofacts.tw` 嗎
這幾天發生的情況，如果在 firefox 登入後網址再切到 `cofacts.g0v.tw` 會等於沒有登入，但是切回到 `cofacts.tw` 就還是有登入的狀態，chrome 沒有這種情況。
mrorz 13:52:56
印象中不會切換
mrorz 13:52:56
印象中不會切換
mrorz 13:53:14
登入 cookie 應該都是在 cofacts.tw @@
mrorz 13:53:14
登入 cookie 應該都是在 cofacts.tw @@
mrorz 13:54:00
我可以再查一下
mrorz 13:54:00
可以再查一下

2022-08-10

github2 00:43:54

<https://github.com/cofacts/takedowns/pull/84|#84 Create 0810-love-scam.md>

這個有很多故事 www

今晚有人檢舉此篇訊息下某 LINE 使用者補充交友詐騙的訊息。

點進去看之後我覺得被檢舉的人沒違規，反而訊息下有一排人非常可疑，一查就發現通通都是今天晚上 9 點註冊 + 回應的，直接一波帶走。

不過其中一個人特別有趣，他除了推自家的詐騙網之外，還同時在另一個網站的訊息下補充：「詐騙集團 女生就是客服」
https://cofacts.github.io/community-builder/#/editorworks?type=2&day=365&userId=41SxgoIBZ4FY5vnAwnUM&showAll=1

⋯⋯檢舉 LINE 使用者的補充的，就是你吧 wwwwww
不過我覺得同業互踩「詐騙集團 女生就是客服」這件事情
是不是就代表，其實交友詐騙的型態就是這種
一個人分飾多角，用這個方式來吸金的作法 w
github2 00:43:54

<https://github.com/cofacts/takedowns/pull/84|#84 Create 0810-love-scam.md>

這個有很多故事 www

今晚有人檢舉此篇訊息下某 LINE 使用者補充交友詐騙的訊息。

點進去看之後我覺得被檢舉的人沒違規，反而訊息下有一排人非常可疑，一查就發現通通都是今天晚上 9 點註冊 + 回應的，直接一波帶走。

不過其中一個人特別有趣，他除了推自家的詐騙網之外，還同時在另一個網站的訊息下補充：「詐騙集團 女生就是客服」
https://cofacts.github.io/community-builder/#/editorworks?type=2&day=365&userId=41SxgoIBZ4FY5vnAwnUM&showAll=1

⋯⋯檢舉 LINE 使用者的補充的，就是你吧 wwwwww
不過我覺得同業互踩「詐騙集團 女生就是客服」這件事情
是不是就代表，其實交友詐騙的型態就是這種
一個人分飾多角，用這個方式來吸金的作法 w
mrorz 10:47:26
今日議程
https://g0v.hackmd.io/@mrorz/cofacts-meeting-notes/%2FuZ3gouRWRamtrCFzKFrgnw

HackMD

Cofacts 會議記錄 - HackMD

# Cofacts 會議記錄 ## 2022 - [20220810 會議記錄](/uZ3gouRWRamtrCFzKFrgnw) - [20220803 會議記錄](/6gLsmuTUQia3

github2 18:06:01

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-line-bot/pull/316#discussion_r942268386|Comment on #316 Feature/image search>

Q: seems that we should delete these text related search from `processImage` test ?

github2 18:06:01

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-line-bot/pull/316#discussion_r942268386|Comment on #316 Feature/image search>

Q: seems that we should delete these text related search from `processImage` test ?

github2 18:53:29

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-line-bot/pull/316#discussion_r942291753|Comment on #316 Feature/image search>

I think we should not show "None of these messages matches mine" if there is a 100% match. Because if the user chooses this option and tries to submit the image, `MediaManager` will find that the uploaded file has 100% match and does not perform upload anyway.

github2 18:53:29

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-line-bot/pull/316#discussion_r942291753|Comment on #316 Feature/image search>

I think we should not show "None of these messages matches mine" if there is a 100% match. Because if the user chooses this option and tries to submit the image, `MediaManager` will find that the uploaded file has 100% match and does not perform upload anyway.

github2 18:53:29

Review on #316 Feature/image search

Thanks for the contribution! Although the PR is big, it's still understandable. The PR description and the weekly sync helped a lot :+1: Please find my comments below.

github2 18:53:29

Review on #316 Feature/image search

Thanks for the contribution! Although the PR is big, it's still understandable. The PR description and the weekly sync helped a lot :+1: Please find my comments below.

github2 18:53:29

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-line-bot/pull/316#discussion_r942298351|Comment on #316 Feature/image search>

The height of thumbnail image always does not exceed 240px (set <https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-api/blob/8eb18c6202be8735e5d7fe31db4fee5acd7eee06/src/graphql/mutations/CreateMediaArticle.js#L67|in rumors-api>). Can we set the <https://developers.line.biz/en/docs/messaging-api/flex-message-layout/#box-max-height|maxHeight> of hero so that images don't get blurry?

github2 18:53:29

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-line-bot/pull/316#discussion_r942298351|Comment on #316 Feature/image search>

The height of thumbnail image always does not exceed 240px (set <https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-api/blob/8eb18c6202be8735e5d7fe31db4fee5acd7eee06/src/graphql/mutations/CreateMediaArticle.js#L67|in rumors-api>). Can we set the <https://developers.line.biz/en/docs/messaging-api/flex-message-layout/#box-max-height|maxHeight> of hero so that images don't get blurry?

github2 19:05:25

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-line-bot/pull/316#discussion_r942318872|Comment on #316 Feature/image search>

Outdated comment. Hope we can fix the comment along with this PR XD Suggested change

github2 19:05:25

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-line-bot/pull/316#discussion_r942318872|Comment on #316 Feature/image search>

Outdated comment. Hope we can fix the comment along with this PR XD Suggested change

2022-08-11

cai 15:07:17
https://cofacts.tw/article/lz3lrtk1r2y6
提到大立光跟台積電，這能直接跟那些公司講了吧
github2 16:57:06

Review on #317 docs: fix hyperlink

Thanks for the update!

github2 16:57:06

Review on #317 docs: fix hyperlink

Thanks for the update!

github2 16:58:00

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-line-bot/pull/317#issuecomment-1211719695|Comment on #317 docs: fix hyperlink>

*Pull Request Test Coverage Report for <https://coveralls.io/builds/51586704|Build 2838255119>* • *0* of *0* changed or added relevant lines in *0* files are covered. • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage. • Overall coverage remained the same at *85.487%* * * * * * * *:yellow_heart: - <https://coveralls.io|Coveralls>*

github2 16:58:00

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-line-bot/pull/317#issuecomment-1211719695|Comment on #317 docs: fix hyperlink>

*Pull Request Test Coverage Report for <https://coveralls.io/builds/51586704|Build 2838255119>* • *0* of *0* changed or added relevant lines in *0* files are covered. • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage. • Overall coverage remained the same at *85.487%* * * * * * * *:yellow_heart: - <https://coveralls.io|Coveralls>*

cai 18:43:37
自從那個假紓困詐騙，現在看到補貼相關的舊文浮上來都會感覺不妙
這兩天看到的紓困詐騙是寫要48小時內送出，是因為防詐達人判定寫要48小時後再傳一次嗎
https://cofacts.g0v.tw/article/2s000nj9u1uhw

難怪兒童補助那篇又浮上來
咦，我以為只是想要用限時來降低人的判斷力
跟限時特價一樣
cai 18:43:37
自從那個假紓困詐騙，現在看到補貼相關的舊文浮上來都會感覺不妙
這兩天看到的紓困詐騙是寫要48小時內送出，是因為防詐達人判定寫要48小時後再傳一次嗎
https://cofacts.g0v.tw/article/2s000nj9u1uhw

難怪兒童補助那篇又浮上來
咦，我以為只是想要用限時來降低人的判斷力
跟限時特價一樣
😢 2
cai 21:13:05
這兩天看到的紓困詐騙是寫要48小時內送出，是因為防詐達人判定寫要48小時後再傳一次嗎
https://cofacts.g0v.tw/article/2s000nj9u1uhw

難怪兒童補助那篇又浮上來

2022-08-12

2022-08-15

2022-08-17

github2 13:49:46

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-line-bot/issues/319|#319 Articles list and article LIFF should show image>

From 20220810 test result: <https://g0v.hackmd.io/uZ3gouRWRamtrCFzKFrgnw#%E6%9C%AA%E7%AB%9F%E9%A0%85%E7%9B%AE|https://g0v.hackmd.io/uZ3gouRWRamtrCFzKFrgnw#%E6%9C%AA%E7%AB%9F%E9%A0%85%E7%9B%AE> LIFF article list (articles) and article page should support displaying images

github2 13:49:46

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-line-bot/issues/319|#319 Articles list and article LIFF should show image>

From 20220810 test result: <https://g0v.hackmd.io/uZ3gouRWRamtrCFzKFrgnw#%E6%9C%AA%E7%AB%9F%E9%A0%85%E7%9B%AE|https://g0v.hackmd.io/uZ3gouRWRamtrCFzKFrgnw#%E6%9C%AA%E7%AB%9F%E9%A0%85%E7%9B%AE> LIFF article list (articles) and article page should support displaying images

github2 13:58:31

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-line-bot/issues/320|#320 Incorrect thank-you message when editing reply request (comments)>

From 20220810 test result: <https://g0v.hackmd.io/uZ3gouRWRamtrCFzKFrgnw#%E6%9C%AA%E7%AB%9F%E9%A0%85%E7%9B%AE|https://g0v.hackmd.io/uZ3gouRWRamtrCFzKFrgnw#%E6%9C%AA%E7%AB%9F%E9%A0%85%E7%9B%AE> *As-is* <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/108608/185045067-dfd5fdb5-4f7c-47d8-baad-3037bb1fe2d4.png|image> *To-be* If there is no other people submitting reply request / comments, we should not show the second sentence. Just use the first sentence (thank the user).

github2 13:58:31

<https://github.com/cofacts/rumors-line-bot/issues/320|#320 Incorrect thank-you message when editing reply request (comments)>

From 20220810 test result: <https://g0v.hackmd.io/uZ3gouRWRamtrCFzKFrgnw#%E6%9C%AA%E7%AB%9F%E9%A0%85%E7%9B%AE|https://g0v.hackmd.io/uZ3gouRWRamtrCFzKFrgnw#%E6%9C%AA%E7%AB%9F%E9%A0%85%E7%9B%AE> *As-is* <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/108608/185045067-dfd5fdb5-4f7c-47d8-baad-3037bb1fe2d4.png|image> *To-be* If there is no other people submitting reply request / comments, we should not show the second sentence. Just use the first sentence (thank the user).

github2