gis

Comment on #1 OSMnx and Treepedia

&gt; Hello! &gt; &gt; First of all thank you so much for this project, is quite amazing! &gt; &gt; I took a first try in generating a greenview index map for a smaller area. To do that, I used OSMnx to extract a graph from a location and then saved the shapefile (in what I think was the correct projection). All steps run ok, but I noticed I was getting always the same value of GVI (-166,667) for all coordinates which indicated immediately that there was something wrong with my input file. &gt; &gt; Is there maybe something I'm missing, for example OSMnx shape files not proper inputs for treepedia? Is there an example of how the two would work together that you can share? I'm only asking since that would make for a very flexible and bespoke workflow for treepedia. &gt; &gt; P.S.: If it heps I can share the .shp file I input later today. &gt; &gt; Thanks in advance! &gt; &gt; Kind regards, &gt; Theodore. You should check if you are using your own Google Street View image API key (<https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/streetview/usage-and-billing|https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/streetview/usage-and-billing>). The former key is expired because Google changed its pricing policy. The reason why we set negative value is used to tell users that the result is invalid. If you have too many invalid results, that means your images may not be properly downloaded.

y26805/Treepedia_Public

Treepedia package for public use. Forked from the official `mittrees` account for Python 3