#twc-g0v-en
2018-12-04
patcon
04:21:30
PLS DO READ <3
https://twitter.com/RichDecibels/status/1069135333407649794?s=19
cc @chihao @thebestsophist @stationaery
https://twitter.com/RichDecibels/status/1069135333407649794?s=19
cc @chihao @thebestsophist @stationaery
- 👍2
patcon
12:42:34
Thoughts on renaming this channel to #tech-workers-coop? To make it more self-descriptive for skimmers of the channel list?
Danny
2018-12-04 23:20:14
Is this channel a co-op?
Danny
2018-12-04 23:20:54
it might make sense to call it #g0v-tech-workers
patcon
2018-12-05 08:22:11
i believe the original intention was after that convo, for ppl interested in discussions around and future plans for starting a tech workers coop
patcon
2018-12-05 08:23:02
but heh, case in point for improving the name, maybe 🙂
Danny
2018-12-06 22:07:38
The original intent was for people to share their struggles about tough jobs, low pay, working overtime and weekends, quitting,... and find solutions, together!
Danny
2018-12-06 22:08:18
@chihao @phiven thoughts?
patcon
2018-12-06 22:34:51
Oh! I totally misunderstood. (I was late for the meeting, and thought it was about starting a co-op in taipei, and i thought this was created to preserve momentum and lead to perhaps some action.)
Regardless, I def just hope for this to have a channel name that aligns with whatever ppl feel we're here for :)
Regardless, I def just hope for this to have a channel name that aligns with whatever ppl feel we're here for :)
patcon
2018-12-06 22:37:04
Haha I guess this is like classic rare example of when channel purpose is good to have
chihao
2018-12-07 20:53:15
@patcon ++ for trying to make things better. My thoughts are similar to @stationaery
patcon
2018-12-07 20:55:12
Ok, I was out of sync, but glad to be back in! Sorry for the noise y'all!
chihao
2018-12-07 20:55:25
Noise is great!
patcon
2018-12-07 20:57:14
Ok, my own channel name suggestion to toss in the hat is `#tech-work-solidarity` :)
Danny
2018-12-07 21:28:06
@patcon lest it go unsaid, the intention for this channel was also to make connections between g0v and twc techworkerscoalition.org
patcon
2018-12-07 23:29:22
Could we bridge so we each have this channel for sharing on our own home-turf? Then ppl don't need to be as committed as you two to say "hi" :)
Danny
2018-12-08 10:42:36
Wait.. Why have two channels, exactly?
patcon
2018-12-08 20:29:19
Why: so there's one here in g0vtw slack (convenient for taiwan ppl) and its bridged to another in the twc slack (convenient for twc members who might understandably not have as much time to spend on another slack). Is that what you meant? :)
Felipe
2018-12-09 03:40:54
Yeah this channel resulted from a session we had between workers discussing similarities and differences in their working conditions and organizational strategies
Felipe
2018-12-09 03:41:37
It would be great to keep those conversations going as I learned a lot from our Taiwanese counterparts’ experience
Danny
23:20:14
Is this channel a co-op?
Danny
23:20:54
it might make sense to call it #g0v-tech-workers
2018-12-05
patcon
08:22:11
i believe the original intention was after that convo, for ppl interested in discussions around and future plans for starting a tech workers coop
patcon
08:23:02
but heh, case in point for improving the name, maybe 🙂
2018-12-06
Danny
22:07:38
The original intent was for people to share their struggles about tough jobs, low pay, working overtime and weekends, quitting,... and find solutions, together!
1
Danny
22:08:18
@chihao @phiven thoughts?
patcon
22:34:51
Replied to a thread: 2018-12-04 12:42:34
Oh! I totally misunderstood. (I was late for the meeting, and thought it was about starting a co-op in taipei, and i thought this was created to preserve momentum and lead to perhaps some action.)
Regardless, I def just hope for this to have a channel name that aligns with whatever ppl feel we're here for :)
Regardless, I def just hope for this to have a channel name that aligns with whatever ppl feel we're here for :)
patcon
22:37:04
Haha I guess this is like classic rare example of when channel purpose is good to have
2018-12-07
chihao
20:53:15
@patcon ++ for trying to make things better. My thoughts are similar to @stationaery
patcon
20:55:12
Ok, I was out of sync, but glad to be back in! Sorry for the noise y'all!
chihao
20:55:25
Noise is great!
patcon
20:57:14
Ok, my own channel name suggestion to toss in the hat is `#tech-work-solidarity` :)
@null
21:07:38
Ah yes, and I will turn off english-to-mandarin translation in here. I told someone I would and forgor
Danny
21:28:06
@patcon lest it go unsaid, the intention for this channel was also to make connections between g0v and twc techworkerscoalition.org
- 🙌1
patcon
23:29:22
Could we bridge so we each have this channel for sharing on our own home-turf? Then ppl don't need to be as committed as you two to say "hi" :)
2018-12-08
Danny
10:42:36
Wait.. Why have two channels, exactly?
patcon
20:29:19
Why: so there's one here in g0vtw slack (convenient for taiwan ppl) and its bridged to another in the twc slack (convenient for twc members who might understandably not have as much time to spend on another slack). Is that what you meant? :)
2018-12-09
Felipe
03:40:54
Replied to a thread: 2018-12-04 12:42:34
Yeah this channel resulted from a session we had between workers discussing similarities and differences in their working conditions and organizational strategies
Felipe
03:41:37
It would be great to keep those conversations going as I learned a lot from our Taiwanese counterparts’ experience
- 💯2
@null
12:11:12
Re: bridging techworkerscoalition slack with g0v, potentially using this channel.
wanted to bring this other topic up to channel level: https://g0v-tw.slack.com/archives/CD8LNSGMN/p1544196562014600?thread_ts=1543898554.005300&cid=CD8LNSGMN
wanted to bring this other topic up to channel level: https://g0v-tw.slack.com/archives/CD8LNSGMN/p1544196562014600?thread_ts=1543898554.005300&cid=CD8LNSGMN
@null
2018-12-09 12:12:41
@Felipe @Danny feel really in agreement with your comments in thread. alas, sorry, i apologize for being dense, but i'm still uncertaain on how you two feel about bridging slacks for this channel and one in twc slack. as i understand that, the goal would be to create an overlap in which g0v and twc people can most easily occupy. (ie. the IRC effect of "every interaction is /join away" rather than "register and /join")
would y'all feel that aligned and supportive of what you're aspiring for in being here? 🙂
would y'all feel that aligned and supportive of what you're aspiring for in being here? 🙂
@null
12:12:41
@Felipe @Danny feel really in agreement with your comments in thread. alas, sorry, i apologize for being dense, but i'm still uncertaain on how you two feel about bridging slacks for this channel and one in twc slack. as i understand that, the goal would be to create an overlap in which g0v and twc people can most easily occupy. (ie. the IRC effect of "every interaction is /join away" rather than "register and /join")
would y'all feel that aligned and supportive of what you're aspiring for in being here? 🙂
would y'all feel that aligned and supportive of what you're aspiring for in being here? 🙂
2018-12-10
@null
12:29:22
Maybe when there is any indication of a need for that, it’d be worth doing. But right now I believe we’re seeing a need is for people in this channel to have more conversations about what we’re experiencing and why we think that happens and generally just being in this space.. and maybe we can add more bridges or whatever after activity demands it
@null
13:45:22
Ok, with the qualification below: as you wish :)
With genuine respect, I should admit the "wait for need" positioning of bridging does feel akin to saying of civic hackathons "they'll come when there's a need", which feels slightly off if the philosphy of the format is connection -- more about emergence, than reaction.
But that's a very personalised read through my own ways of moving :)
I was saying I can make the bridge connection for free at near-zero time cost to anyone on your end (just regular slack account requested like any new slack member), but it sounds like you're requesting that I don't. (i.e. more than "i don't personally think we need", but rather as a thoughtful yet firm block on my taking action.) Pls correct me if I'm misinterpreting :heart:
With genuine respect, I should admit the "wait for need" positioning of bridging does feel akin to saying of civic hackathons "they'll come when there's a need", which feels slightly off if the philosphy of the format is connection -- more about emergence, than reaction.
But that's a very personalised read through my own ways of moving :)
I was saying I can make the bridge connection for free at near-zero time cost to anyone on your end (just regular slack account requested like any new slack member), but it sounds like you're requesting that I don't. (i.e. more than "i don't personally think we need", but rather as a thoughtful yet firm block on my taking action.) Pls correct me if I'm misinterpreting :heart:
2018-12-15
2018-12-18
2018-12-27
@null
01:49:14
Hello, Merry Christmas !!!
An important question, how is it possible to work remotely from China if your company is in the USA, how to use slack or google or what options there are to supply these platforms, HELP!
An important question, how is it possible to work remotely from China if your company is in the USA, how to use slack or google or what options there are to supply these platforms, HELP!