txt

Some replication on resiliency of socialable non profit digital humanization. 1. What is resiliency on digital defensive problematic coherent? 2. What does resiliency do on non profit ogr and gov and soc ? 3. What is coherency on non profitable endurance that endure in soc? 4. In soc, g0v, org, humanizative digital being on the network of www, what does resiliency do? 5. Resiliency is a co-science or co-cognitive coincidence or is it a defensive e-digital utilization on net working problem? 6. Networking is problematic and the key point on building resiliency to make a tower of NON PROFIT OG BIG BROTHER 1984 on defensive networking, how is our nobodys doing it? 7. What is the core direction on digitalizing the cursive nobody’s? Empowering Polization of a single fence? How to co-defence nobody’s convenience of core ideology? That co-defense digitalization on 民防 is on what case of joinable society? How is it going to make in soc, gov, ogr, big og on weaponization of the world war positivity and defendation on TW positivity. Which is GREAT! Ref. Organisation. Government. Society. Or g0v coherebt nobodys #overmydeadbody is the coherent memeXDD

Some replication on resiliency of socialable non profit digital humanization. 1. What is resiliency on digital defensive problematic coherent? 2. What does resiliency do on non profit ogr and gov and soc ? 3. What is coherency on non profitable endurance that endure in soc? 4. In soc, g0v, org, humanizative digital being on the network of www, what does resiliency do? 5. Resiliency is a co-science or co-cognitive coincidence or is it a defensive e-digital utilization on net working problem? 6. Networking is problematic and the key point on building resiliency to make a tower of NON PROFIT OG BIG BROTHER 1984 on defensive networking, how is our nobodys doing it? 7. What is the core direction on digitalizing the cursive nobody’s? Empowering Polization of a single fence? How to co-defence nobody’s convenience of core ideology? That co-defense digitalization on 民防 is on what case of joinable society? How is it going to make in soc, gov, ogr, big og on weaponization of the world war positivity and defendation on TW positivity. Which is GREAT! Ref. Organisation. Government. Society. Or g0v coherebt nobodys #overmydeadbody is the coherent memeXDD

How to feel layback in this era

How to feel layback in this era

<#C056EHM42B1|civil-defense> <#C2PPMRQGP|cofacts> <#CD9EMS0F3|gis> This is the core nation of collaborative on nog’s nobody’s core of defensive knowledge. That in the maps pages and co-defense network and factual networking is the resiliency PROBLEMATIC ENDURANCE OF OUR DIGITALIZATION OF CO- nodoby’s networking spatial reconsideration on RESILIENCY. Nobody is already doing it.

<#C056EHM42B1|civil-defense> <#C2PPMRQGP|cofacts> <#CD9EMS0F3|gis> This is the core nation of collaborative on nog’s nobody’s core of defensive knowledge. That in the maps pages and co-defense network and factual networking is the resiliency PROBLEMATIC ENDURANCE OF OUR DIGITALIZATION OF CO- nodoby’s networking spatial reconsideration on RESILIENCY. Nobody is already doing it.

What do defensive gis tool do to our google maps and networking non profitable ogr og ? What is the open source coherence on nobodys projective ? What is the defensive about? There is also a coherent on cc cofacts! <#C2PPMRQGP|cofacts> :cofacts:

LU 2024-01-07 07:06:39

FACTUAL PROBLEM:
1. WHAT DO CILVIL KNOW
2. WHAT CAN NODODY LET CIVIL KNOW
3. WHAT IS THE CORE IDEOLOGY TO BE RESILIENCE ON CIVIL DEFENSE?
4. HOW IS IT DOING IT ON NETWORKING?
5. #gis #cofacts #civil-defense
6. HOW CAN THEY COWORK?
7. For another change on coworking , am I speaking of my own opinion?
YES But i am nobody.
#txt

What do defensive gis tool do to our google maps and networking non profitable ogr og ? What is the open source coherence on nobodys projective ? What is the defensive about? There is also a coherent on cc cofacts! <#C2PPMRQGP|cofacts> :cofacts:

LU 2024-01-07 07:06:39

FACTUAL PROBLEM:
1. WHAT DO CILVIL KNOW
2. WHAT CAN NODODY LET CIVIL KNOW
3. WHAT IS THE CORE IDEOLOGY TO BE RESILIENCE ON CIVIL DEFENSE?
4. HOW IS IT DOING IT ON NETWORKING?
5. #gis #cofacts #civil-defense
6. HOW CAN THEY COWORK?
7. For another change on coworking , am I speaking of my own opinion?
YES But i am nobody.
#txt

Serveral opinion: • On Considerit UI ideation : if considerit is a human technology intelligence, is it a tool, or another human creature, if it would be just a tool, what will we considerit for make for, is it a opening tool for and not just for user consideration or "an opinion organiser" IS IT USEFUL FOR GOV on MAKING DECISION, or it useful for everybody. User friendly...? 簡言:是否達到以AI工具幫助決定的目的? • First I'll posting my opinion on opinionation on <https://vtaiwan.consider.it/>: 1. _*政府機關的內控機制應該要納入獨立的外部專家:*_內控機制為何目的為主為選入外部專家的獨立監察之永久目的，以職業專業為例，是否以外部專家之能力或者以外部專家的獨立性作為選擇基準?並且作為外部專家之職責，是否需要實際加入參與，何為獨立之獨立外部專家，何為不獨立之不獨立外部專家?做為評選基準，應該如何選擇外部專家的角色與能力與選擇機制，並且多少位，多少專業與職業法人? 2. *_事前評估應該包含勞動力取代上的影響:_ 這一問題的bias我非常在意。*新聞媒體上報導過的新北市公務員過勞而死的新聞，是否與電腦使用與勞動力過度之使用作為 _*取代*_ 上 更好的使用說明方法? 作為一位自然人與勞基法標準之老公行為準則，自然人該有何種基準，使用此工具作為良好健康的使用規範與提醒。要取代還太早，在資本勞動體系底下，取代人力的永遠是老闆的金錢制度與決策，勞動力並非事前評估的取代方案。反而是使用工具之健康原則，以Apple與Google開發使用工具為例，*使用者之健康更應為討論議題。*

Serveral opinion: • On Considerit UI ideation : if considerit is a human technology intelligence, is it a tool, or another human creature, if it would be just a tool, what will we considerit for make for, is it a opening tool for and not just for user consideration or "an opinion organiser" IS IT USEFUL FOR GOV on MAKING DECISION, or it useful for everybody. User friendly...? 簡言:是否達到以AI工具幫助決定的目的? • First I'll posting my opinion on opinionation on <https://vtaiwan.consider.it/>: 1. _*政府機關的內控機制應該要納入獨立的外部專家:*_內控機制為何目的為主為選入外部專家的獨立監察之永久目的，以職業專業為例，是否以外部專家之能力或者以外部專家的獨立性作為選擇基準?並且作為外部專家之職責，是否需要實際加入參與，何為獨立之獨立外部專家，何為不獨立之不獨立外部專家?做為評選基準，應該如何選擇外部專家的角色與能力與選擇機制，並且多少位，多少專業與職業法人? 2. *_事前評估應該包含勞動力取代上的影響:_ 這一問題的bias我非常在意。*新聞媒體上報導過的新北市公務員過勞而死的新聞，是否與電腦使用與勞動力過度之使用作為 _*取代*_ 上 更好的使用說明方法? 作為一位自然人與勞基法標準之老公行為準則，自然人該有何種基準，使用此工具作為良好健康的使用規範與提醒。要取代還太早，在資本勞動體系底下，取代人力的永遠是老闆的金錢制度與決策，勞動力並非事前評估的取代方案。反而是使用工具之健康原則，以Apple與Google開發使用工具為例，*使用者之健康更應為討論議題。*

Some consider ratio. For a more concise decision on considerit AI considerative tool on taiwanese govermental digitalization. Considerit is going to impact the decisive inconciveable numerous 公務員s。 Inconciveable dicisive digital tool is the most considerative unconceivable changement on tool AI.

Some consider ratio. For a more concise decision on considerit AI considerative tool on taiwanese govermental digitalization. Considerit is going to impact the decisive inconciveable numerous 公務員s。 Inconciveable dicisive digital tool is the most considerative unconceivable changement on tool AI.

Une dernière indice sur l’idée du projet de considerit AI. Is it fun to use? It’s interesting! I’m in for it. Just some suggestion.s’ 1. The enjeu of facing the challenge of IT internet using and surfing on the board of IG FB THREADS LINE X TG .eg. 2. Is it a useful tool for all aggregation? Is it for everyone and for every platform? 3. What is the considerit AI core idea? Let’s find out tomorrow! 4. I luv Mozilla. 5. Anyway I think considerit should be useful for the current world of digitalization of current governmental optimizing the whole internative choice.

Une dernière indice sur l’idée du projet de considerit AI. Is it fun to use? It’s interesting! I’m in for it. Just some suggestion.s’ 1. The enjeu of facing the challenge of IT internet using and surfing on the board of IG FB THREADS LINE X TG .eg. 2. Is it a useful tool for all aggregation? Is it for everyone and for every platform? 3. What is the considerit AI core idea? Let’s find out tomorrow! 4. I luv Mozilla. 5. Anyway I think considerit should be useful for the current world of digitalization of current governmental optimizing the whole internative choice.

Some contemplatings on simplification of a co-op workspace. 一些對於協作簡化的合作思考。 1. Is it neutral? A simple thing is it neutral every single event. 是否中立透明。在每一個活動中，是否合宜？ 2. Is it a justification on efficiency? 是否是效率的正義？ 3. Is it an only answer on meet up in vtaiwan? 是否是Vtaiwan密集聚會唯一進行法？ 4. Is simple better? 簡單是不是比較好？ For every attendant : you are greater than you think. 給所有參與者： 你比你想像中更強大。

Some contemplatings on simplification of a co-op workspace. 一些對於協作簡化的合作思考。 1. Is it neutral? A simple thing is it neutral every single event. 是否中立透明。在每一個活動中，是否合宜？ 2. Is it a justification on efficiency? 是否是效率的正義？ 3. Is it an only answer on meet up in vtaiwan? 是否是Vtaiwan密集聚會唯一進行法？ 4. Is simple better? 簡單是不是比較好？ For every attendant : you are greater than you think. 給所有參與者： 你比你想像中更強大。

民主實驗:microscope:票價實驗:petri_dish:化學價位 :atom_symbol: 介質：票位 :books: 影響因子：賓客與客主與金主 :key: 贏家：民主社會：輸家：金主家，勞動階級，歷史遺忘左派。變成：無政府主義之前的先鋒。 :face_with_monocle: 選票價值等等相同：選票價值等等不同一。 :face_with_monocle: 選票介質與教育範圍、選票教育、選票再教育、選票再教育之公務。公務之公務，人民之事務。 :disguised_face: 輿論之前人人都有教育。輿論之後人人都需要勞動、再教育。 :face_with_raised_eyebrow: 價位實驗：意義：義務：義務教育：義務教育師資。 每個人都是老師。 Every partner, every teacher. Being teacher is a point. All should be once teacher because we age. Let’s be friend. Isn’t easier?

民主實驗:microscope:票價實驗:petri_dish:化學價位 :atom_symbol: 介質：票位 :books: 影響因子：賓客與客主與金主 :key: 贏家：民主社會：輸家：金主家，勞動階級，歷史遺忘左派。變成：無政府主義之前的先鋒。 :face_with_monocle: 選票價值等等相同：選票價值等等不同一。 :face_with_monocle: 選票介質與教育範圍、選票教育、選票再教育、選票再教育之公務。公務之公務，人民之事務。 :disguised_face: 輿論之前人人都有教育。輿論之後人人都需要勞動、再教育。 :face_with_raised_eyebrow: 價位實驗：意義：義務：義務教育：義務教育師資。 每個人都是老師。 Every partner, every teacher. Being teacher is a point. All should be once teacher because we age. Let’s be friend. Isn’t easier?